Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 25, 2015; 7(11): 1032-1038
Published online Aug 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i11.1032
Table 2 The results of comparison between unilateral and bilateral stent deployment
Ref.No. of patients
Successful deployment [% (n)]
P valueSuccessful drainage [% (n)]
P valueStent patency (mo)
P valueSurvival period (mo)
P value
UnilateralBilateralUnilateralBilateralUnilateralBilateralUnilateralBilateralUnilateralBilateral
De Palma et al[9]PS 79PS 7889 (70/79)77 (60/78)0.04181 (64/79)73 (57/78)0.0482NANA4.74.70.482
Mukai et al[4]PS 15PS 15100 (15/15)100 (15/15)100 (15/15)100 (15/15)3.43.70.746NANA
MS 14MS 16100 (14/14)100 (16/16)100 (14/14)100 (16/16)12.19.80.3467NANA
Liberato et al[3]PS 27PS 40NA95 (38/40)NA95 (38/40)4.04.20.0004NANA
MS 33MS 45NA93 (42/45)NA93 (42/45)5.66.8> 0.0001NANA
Chang et al[10]PS or MS 69PS or MS 29NANANANANANA2.77.5> 0.01
Naitoh et al[11]MS 17MS 29100 (17/17)90 (26/29)94 (16/17)90 (25/26)7.016.30.0095.56.80.559
Iwano et al[12]MS 63MS 1995 (60/63)90 (17/19)NANA4.44.20.32205.76.10.4908