Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2015; 7(1): 13-36
Published online Jan 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i1.13
Table 2 Comparison of different diagnostic modalities in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding
Ref.CountryDesignNo. of patientsComparatorYield of CE, (%)Yield of Comparator, (%)Significant difference? (yes/no)CE superior? (yes/no)Other
Triester et al[80]United StatesMeta-analysis and Systematic review396PE6328YesYesNNT = 3 to yield one additional clinically significant finding with CE
88SB radiography (barium contrast and enteroclysis)678YesYesNNT = 3 to yield one additional clinically significant finding with CE
Leighton et al[82]United StatesMeta-analysis and Systematic review396PE6328YesYesYield of significant findings: CE = 56% vs PE = 26%, NNT = 3 to yield one additional clinically significant finding with CE
88Barium radiography678YesYesYield of significant findings: CE = 42% vs SB barium radiography = 6%, NNT = 3 to yield one additional clinically significant finding with CE
42Intraoperative enteroscopy8383NoNo
17Mesenteric angiography4753NoNo
Chen et al[205]ChinaMeta-analysis and Systematic review277DBE6156NoNoCE was superior if no combination of oral + anal approach <-> DBE was superior when a combination of the two insertion approaches was done
Pasha et al[95]United StatesMeta-analysis and Systematic review397DBE2424NoNoCE should be the initial diagnostic test for determining insertion route of DBE
Arakawa et al[76]JapanRetrospective Study162DBE5464NoNo
Teshima et al[77]Canada, The NetherlandsMeta-analysis and Systematic review651DBE6256NoYesYield of DBE after positive CE = 75.0% <-> yield after negative CE = 27.5%
Leung et al[206]ChinaRCT60Mesenteric angiography5320YesYesNo significant difference in the long-term outcomes (transfusion need, hospitalization for rebleeding,mortality)
Wang et al[207]ChinaMeta-analysis and Systematic review279CT5334YesYesComplementary role to CE and can be used as a triage tool prior to DBE in evaluating OGIB