©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2014; 6(4): 128-136
Published online Apr 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i4.128
Published online Apr 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i4.128
Table 2 E.G. Scan™ and conventional endoscopy esophageal findings
| Finding | E.G. Scan™ | Conventional EGD |
| Esophagus | ||
| Esophageal varices (overall) | 20 | 21 |
| Small | 5 | 8 |
| Large | 11 | 13 |
| Erosive GERD | 13 | 29 |
| Grade A-B | 10 | 20 |
| Grade C | 2 | 8 |
| Grade D | 1 | 1 |
| Hiatal hernia | 13 | 33 |
| Barrett’s esophagus | 8 | 12 |
| Esophageal carcinoma | 2 | 2 |
| Esophageal angiodysplasia | 1 | 1 |
| Gastric heterotopic mucosa | 1 | 1 |
- Citation: Aedo MR, Zavala-González M&, Meixueiro-Daza A, Remes-Troche JM. Accuracy of transnasal endoscopy with a disposable esophagoscope compared to conventional endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(4): 128-136
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v6/i4/128.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i4.128