Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2026; 18(11): 125797
Published online Nov 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.125797
Published online Nov 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.125797
Table 1 Published reports of endoscope entrapment or retention attributed to TC-325 (Hemospray) adhesion, distinguishing full case reports from conference abstracts
| Ref. | Report type | Hemostatic agent | Indication/bleeding source | How the scope became stuck | How it was freed/managed | Complications/outcome |
| Smith et al[19] and Smith et al[20] | Conference abstract (SEAL prospective registry interim data, n = 82), with the same two events reported in the subsequent full registry publication (n = 63) | TC-325 | Nonvariceal upper GI bleeding (UGIB), various lesions | Endoscope became adherent to esophageal mucosa after application in retroflexion (2 patients) | Not detailed | Not detailed; listed as technical complications |
| Yii et al[21] | Full case report | TC-325 (Hemospray) | Bleeding gastric cardia malignancy (lymphoma) | Powder adhesion after application; endoscope retained at the gastroesophageal junction | Endoscope left in situ under intensive care and withdrawn after approximately 48 hours once the powder had sloughed | Prolonged retention (approximately 48 hours); mechanical ventilation/critical care |
| Shaikh and Parikh[22] | Conference abstract | TC-325 | Bleeding of gastric cardia and fundus | Adhesion after retroflexed application; endoscope retained approximately 6 hours | Traction after transfer to a tertiary center | Scope freed; further outcome not detailed |
| Crowley[23] | Full case report (anesthesia journal) | TC-325 | Oozing esophageal mass (nonvariceal UGIB; hemoglobin 6.1 g/dL) | Gastroscope could be neither advanced nor withdrawn after application and was found adherent to the esophagus; position of the gastroscope during spraying (retroflexion) not stated | Sedation stopped to protect the airway; fiberoptic video bronchoscope passed orally alongside the gastroscope, secretions suctioned and the adhesive dislodged from the gastroscope with gentle back-and-forth movements; freed in under 15 minutes | No complication; procedure completed; report written from the anesthesia (airway-management) perspective |
| Syed et al[24] | Full case report | TC-325 | Bleeding gastric GIST near the gastroesophageal junction (fundus in the abstract; lesser curve in the case description), treated in retroflexion | Powder coated the scope at the gastroesophageal junction and adhered to mucosa | Torque maneuvering plus withdrawal force (described as moderate in the abstract and as significant in the case description) | Scope freed; no recognized injury, although the authors could not exclude tissue trauma from the force applied; started on imatinib |
| Edwards et al[25] | Full case report (pediatric) | TC-325 | Pediatric upper GI bleeding (22-month-old) | Transient adhesion of the distal endoscope to the esophagus after diffuse application in retroflexion | Constant traction for several seconds with gentle side-to-side rotation; a second endoscope was considered but not feasible because of patient size | No esophageal trauma on re-intubation and no immediate or long-term adverse effects; normal repeat endoscopy at 3 months |
| Guzik et al[26] | Conference abstract | TC-325 | Retained endoscope, case series (upper GI bleeding); number of patients not stated in abstract | Powder adhesion | Not detailed (conference abstract) | Not detailed |
| Echeverria et al[27] | Full case report | TC-325 (with PuraStat gel) | Gastric cardia/fundus AVMs (arteriovenous malformations), upper GI bleeding, INR 7 (retroflexion) | Powder adhesion after retroflexed application | Aggressive water irrigation; scope removed after 90 minutes | Prolonged retention (90 minutes); no further GI bleeding documented; lost to outpatient follow-up |
| Present case | Full case report | TC-325 | Bleeding gastric body ulcer (partial retroflexion) | Insertion tube coated with hydrated powder and bonded to cardia/gastroesophageal junction mucosa after application in partial retroflexion | Irrigation, viscous lidocaine, torque and forceps through the entrapped scope failed; second ultrathin (XP) gastroscope advanced alongside and forceps used to clear the adherent powder under direct vision | Scope freed after 30 minutes; no mucosal injury; no clinically evident rebleeding during admission; discharged to hospice |
- Citation: Gangu K, Daglilar E, Chela HK. Stuck scope: Tackling the adherent scope situation after hemostatic powder application: A case report and review of literature. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(11): 125797
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i11/125797.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.125797