Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2025; 17(8): 109176
Published online Aug 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.109176
Published online Aug 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.109176
Table 5 Polypectomy and detection rates by indication
Indication | Proportions (%) | |||||
Polypectomy rate | ADR | ASLDR | PSDR | SPDR | SSL-DR | |
Overall (n = 1450) | 83.66 | 57.03 | 48 | 37.1 | 30.97 | 30.69 |
Clinical symptoms (n = 419) | 75.1 | 51.31 | 39.38 | 29.83 | 24.34 | 24.34 |
FOBT (+) (n = 100) | 90 | 81 | 58 | 43 | 43 | 42 |
Surveillance (previous patient) (n = 792) | 86.49 | 56.19 | 49.62 | 38.64 | 31.94 | 31.69 |
Surveillance (new patient) (n = 74) | 87.84 | 63.51 | 55.41 | 45.95 | 39.19 | 39.19 |
Screening (n = 65) | 89.23 | 60 | 60 | 46.15 | 33.85 | 32.31 |
- Citation: Williams H, Dierick NR, Lee C, Sundaralingam P, Kostalas SN. Determinants of high sessile serrated lesion detection: Role of faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy quality indicators. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(8): 109176
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i8/109176.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.109176