Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2013; 5(12): 600-604
Published online Dec 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i12.600
Repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection
Yuto Shimamura, Naoki Ishii, Kaoru Nakano, Takashi Ikeya, Kenji Nakamura, Koichi Takagi, Katsuyuki Fukuda, Koyu Suzuki, Yoshiyuki Fujita
Yuto Shimamura, Naoki Ishii, Kaoru Nakano, Takashi Ikeya, Kenji Nakamura, Koichi Takagi, Katsuyuki Fukuda, Yoshiyuki Fujita, Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan
Koyu Suzuki, Department of Pathology, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan
Author contributions: Shimamura Y and Ishii N contributed equally to this work; Shimamura Y and Ishii N designed and performed the research, and wrote the manuscript; Nakano K, Ikeya T, Nakamura K, Takagi K, Fukuda K, Suzuki K and Fujita Y contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Shimamura Y, Ishii N and Suzuki K analyzed the data.
Correspondence to: Yuto Shimamura, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke’s International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan. yutshi@luke.or.jp
Telephone: +81-3-35415151 Fax: +81-3-35440649
Received: September 30, 2013
Revised: November 22, 2013
Accepted: December 9, 2013
Published online: December 16, 2013
Abstract

AIM: To clarify the safety and efficacy of repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection (re-ESD) for locally recurrent gastric cancers after ESD.

METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was performed of the therapeutic efficacy, complications and follow-up results from ESD treatment for early gastric cancers in 521 consecutive patients with 616 lesions at St. Luke`s International Hospital between April 2004 and November 2012. In addition, tumor size, the size of resected specimens and the operation time were compared between re-ESD and initial ESD procedures. A flex knife was used as the primary surgical device and a hook knife was used in cases with severe fibrosis in the submucosal layer. Continuous variables were analyzed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and are expressed as medians (range). Categorical variables were analyzed using a Fisher’s exact test and are reported as proportions. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value less than 0.05.

RESULTS: The number of cases in the re-ESD group and the initial ESD group were 5 and 611, respectively. The median time interval from the initial ESD to re-ESD was 14 (range, 4-44 mo). En bloc resection with free lateral and vertical margins was successfully performed in all re-ESD cases without any complications. No local or distant recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 48 (range, 11-56 mo). Tumor size was not significantly different between the re-ESD group and the initial ESD group (median 22 mm vs 11 mm, P = 0.09), although the size of resected specimens was significantly larger in the re-ESD group (median 47 mm vs 34 mm, P < 0.05). There was a non-significant increase observed in re-ESD operation time compared to initial ESD (median 202 min vs 67 min, respectively, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION: Despite the low patient number and short follow-up, the results suggest that re-ESD is a safe and effective endoscopic treatment for recurrent gastric cancer after ESD.

Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection, Recurrent gastric cancer, Gastric cancer, Endoscopic mucosal resection, Therapeutic endoscopy

Core tip: Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted as one of the standard treatments for early gastric cancers, there are few reports on re-ESD in the literature. This study clarifies that re-ESD is a safe and effective endoscopic treatment for locally recurrent gastric cancers after ESD.