Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Hepatol. Oct 28, 2016; 8(30): 1287-1294
Published online Oct 28, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i30.1287
Table 4 Multiple comparisons of gene expression of Teffs markers in the four studied groups
Group I naïveGroup II Peg/RibaGroup III ANA+Group IV control
TNFRSF4OX 40
Group I naïvebP ≤ 0.01aP ≤ 0.05aP ≤ 0.05
Group II Peg/RibabP ≤ 0.01NS (P > 0.05)bP ≤ 0.01
Group III ANA+aP ≤ 0.05NS (P > 0.05)dP ≤ 0.001
Group IV controlaP ≤ 0.05bP ≤ 0.01dP ≤ 0.001
CD4
Group I naïvebP ≤ 0.01aP ≤ 0.05aP ≤ 0.05
Group II Peg/RibabP ≤ 0.01NS (P > 0.05)aP ≤ 0.05
Group III ANA+aP ≤ 0.05NS (P > 0.05)bP ≤ 0.01
Group IV controlaP ≤ 0.05aP ≤ 0.05bP ≤ 0.01
CD25
Group I naïvebP ≤ 0.01aP ≤ 0.05aP ≤ 0.05
Group II Peg/RibabP ≤ 0.01NS (P > 0.05)bP ≤ 0.01
Group III ANA+aP ≤ 0.05NS (P > 0.05)dP ≤ 0.001
Group IV controlaP ≤ 0.05bP ≤ 0.01dP ≤ 0.001
Interferon-γ
Group I naïvebP ≤ 0.001bP ≤ 0.001aP ≤ 0.05
Group II Peg/RibabP ≤ 0.001NS (P > 0.05)aP ≤ 0.05
Group III ANA+bP ≤ 0.001NS (P > 0.05)bP ≤ 0.01
Group IV controlaP ≤ 0.05aP ≤ 0.05bP ≤ 0.01