©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Hepatol. Apr 8, 2016; 8(10): 461-470
Published online Apr 8, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i10.461
Published online Apr 8, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i10.461
Table 2 Overview of factors contributing to biliary complications
| Ref. | Year | Factor | Inference |
| Dalgic et al[16] | 2005 | Corner sparing sutures | Decreased incidence of complications |
| Castaldo et al[17] | 2007 | Continuous vs interrupted sutures | No difference in two techniques |
| Soejima et al[18] | 2008 | Hilar dissection to preserve blood supply | Decreased incidence of complications |
| Lin et al[19] | 2009 | Microsurgical biliary reconstruction | Decreased incidence of complications |
| Kim et al[12] | 2010 | Telescopic reconstruction of bile duct | Decreased incidence of complications |
| Chok et al[20] | 2011 | CIT and acute cellular rejection | Higher biliary complications with increased CIT |
| Acute cellular rejection predicted biliary strictures | |||
| Horster et al[21] | 2013 | HCV infection as etiology | Higher incidence of biliary complications in patients with HCV infection and higher viral load |
| Wadhawan et al[14] | 2013 | Type of anastomosis | Higher incidence of biliary complications in double duct and cystic duct anastomosis |
| Mathur et al[22] | 2015 | Internal biliary stenting | No difference in complications with or without stenting Decreased incidence of biliary complications |
| Vij et al[15] | 2015 | Corner sparing sutures | |
| Bile duct mucosal eversion |
- Citation: Wadhawan M, Kumar A. Management issues in post living donor liver transplant biliary strictures. World J Hepatol 2016; 8(10): 461-470
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v8/i10/461.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v8.i10.461