Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. May 18, 2015; 7(8): 1133-1141
Published online May 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i8.1133
Table 1 Sustained virological response rates for cirrhotic patients who were treated with direct-acting antiviral agents against hepatitis C virus including peginterferon and ribavirin
Ref. (name of trial)Regimen; genotype; No. of patients (n)Tx historySVR rates
SVR rates for P + R
Cirrhosis vs Non-cirrhosis
Jacobson et al[10] (ADVANCE)TVR + P + R; G1; n = 363: P + R; n = 361-62% vs 78%133% vs 47%
Sherman et al[11] (ILLUMINATE)TVR + P + R; G1; n = 540-63% vs 75%1
Zeuzem et al[12] (REALIZE)TVR + P + R; G1; n = 530: P + R; n = 132+Relapse; 84%-85% vs 83%-90%112% vs 38%
PR; 40%-44% vs 70%-75%10% vs 18%
Null; 22%-28% vs 31%-50%5% vs 6%
Poordad et al[13] (SPRINT-2)BOC + P + R; G1; n = 734: P + R; n = 363-41%-52% vs 67%138% vs 38%
Bacon et al[14] (RESPOND-2)BOC + P + R; G1; n = 299: P + R; n = 76+; relapse or PR35%-77% vs 64%-66%0% vs 24%
Jacobson et al[17]SMV + P + R; G1; n = 521: P + R; n = 264-60% vs 84%2334% vs 55%
Manns et al[18] (QUEST1/2)
Forns et al[19] (PROMISE)SMV + P + R; G1; n = 260: P + R; n = 133+; relapse74% vs 82%2326% vs 41%
Zeuzem et al[20] (ASPIRE)SMV + P + R; G1; n = 199: P + R; n = 66+Relapse; 73% vs 95%0% vs 56%2
PR; 82% vs 79%0% vs 8%
Null; 31% vs 66%0% vs 23%
Lawitz et al[25] (NEUTRINO)SOF + P + R; G1, 4-6; n = 327-80% vs 92%3