Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2015; 7(2): 139-149
Published online Feb 27, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i2.139
Table 2 Diagnostic performance of novel non-invasive biomarkers
Ref.YearMarkernComparatorCut-off-levelSensitivitySpecifityAUC
Toyoda et al[31]2011hs-AFP-L3%666Chronic liver disease and AFP < 20 ng/mL5%41.50%85.10%0.707
Ertle et al[37]2013DCP586Chronic liver disease5 ng/mL45.80%95%0.87
Wan et al[24]2014OsteopontinMeta-analysis (7 studies)mixedPooled: 86%Pooled: 86%0.92
Hsia et al[35]2007IL-6128Mixed, including chronic liver disease and healthy controls3 pg/mL46%95%
Mao et al[21]2010GP734217Mixed, including chronic liver disease and healthy controls8.5 rel. units74.60%97.40%0.94
Giannelli et al[36]2007SCCA961Liver cirrhosis3.8 ng/mL41.90%82.60%0.656
Ertle et al[37]2013AFP combined with DCP586Chronic liver diseaseDCP 5 ng/mL AFP 10 ng/mL78%89.30%0.91
Johnson et al[40]2014GALAD-score670Chronic liver disease93%89%