©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Hepatol. Dec 27, 2014; 6(12): 916-922
Published online Dec 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i12.916
Published online Dec 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i12.916
Table 2 Advantages/disadvantages of some isothermal amplification methods
| Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| NASBA | Specifically designed to detect RNA and in turn RNA viruses | Denaturation step |
| Power saving (41 °C) | Less efficient in Amplifying RNA targets out of the range 120-250 bp | |
| LAMP | Highly specific (utilizes 4-6 primers spanning 6-8 distinct sequences) | Primer design is complex |
| Tolerance to biological substances | Unable to perform multiplex amplification | |
| Could be detected by a cheap turbidity-meter | ||
| SDA | Power saving (37 °C) | Sample prep. needed |
| Nuclease selection is complex | ||
| Inefficient in long target sequences | ||
| RCA | Power saving (37 °C) | Primer is complex |
| Specific enough to allow SNP analysis | RNA amplification is complex | |
| Works only with a circular nucleic acid template | ||
| HDA | Simple primer design | Expensive enzymes |
| Robust to biological substances | ||
| No initial heating step | ||
| RPA | Power saving (37 °C) | |
| Simple primer design | ||
| Extremely quick (20 min) | ||
| No initial heating step | ||
| Robust to biological substances |
- Citation: Zaghloul H, El-shahat M. Recombinase polymerase amplification as a promising tool in hepatitis C virus diagnosis. World J Hepatol 2014; 6(12): 916-922
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v6/i12/916.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v6.i12.916