Brief Article Open Access
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. Mar 27, 2013; 5(3): 120-126
Published online Mar 27, 2013. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v5.i3.120
Severe adverse events during antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus cirrhotic patients: A systematic review
Simona Bota, Ioan Sporea, Roxana Şirli, Alina Popescu, Mirela Dănilă, Mihnea Străin, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300736 Timişoara, Romania
Adriana Maria Neghină, Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300736 Timişoara, Romania
Author contributions: Bota S, Sporea I and Şirli R designed the manuscript; Bota S wrote the manuscript; Bota S, Şirli R, Popescu A and Neghină AM acquired the data; Bota S and Neghină AM performed the statistical analysis; Bota S, Sporea I, Şirli R, Popescu A, Dănilă M and Strain M interpreted the data; Sporea I, Şirli R, Popescu A, Neghina AM, Dănilă M and Străin M revised the manuscript draft; Bota S, Sporea I, Şirli R, Popescu A, Neghină AM, Dănilă M and Străin M approved the final version of the article.
Correspondence to: Simona Bota, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300736 Timişoara, Romania. bota_simona1982@yahoo.com
Telephone: +40-721-656147 Fax: +40-256-488003
Received: June 18, 2012
Revised: November 26, 2012
Accepted: January 17, 2013
Published online: March 27, 2013

Abstract

AIM: To identify severe adverse events (SAEs) leading to treatment discontinuation that occur during antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected cirrhotic patients.

METHODS: We identified all the articles published prior to December 2011 in the PubMed, Medline, Lilacs, Scopus, Ovid, EMBASE, Cochrane and Medscape databases that presented these data in cirrhotic patients. These studies evaluated the rate of SAEs leading to discontinuation of standard care treatment: Pegylated interferon (PegIFN) alpha 2a (135-180 μg/wk) or PegIFN alpha 2b (1 or 1.5 μg/kg per week) and ribavirin (800-1200 mg/d). Patients with genotype 1 + 4 underwent treatment for 48 wk, whereas those with genotypes 2 + 3 were treated for 24 wk.

RESULTS: We included 17 papers in this review, comprising of 1133 patients. Treatment was discontinued due to SAEs in 14.5% of the patients. The most common SAEs were: severe thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia (23.2%), psychiatric disorders (15.5%), decompensation of liver cirrhosis (12.1%) and severe anemia (11.2%). The proportion of patients who needed to discontinue their therapy due to SAEs was significantly higher in patients with Child-Pugh class B and C vs those with Child-Pugh class A: 22% vs 11.4% (P = 0.003). A similar discontinuation rate was found in cirrhotic patients treated with PegIFN alpha 2a and those treated with PegIFN alpha 2b, in combination with ribavirin: 14.2% vs 13.7% (P = 0.96). The overall sustained virological response rate in cirrhotic patients was 37% (95%CI: 33.5-43.1) but was significantly lower in patients with genotype 1 + 4 than in those with genotype 2 + 3: 20.5% (95%CI: 17.9-24.8) vs 56.5% (95%CI: 51.5-63.2), (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: Fourteen point five percent of HCV cirrhotic patients treated with PegIFN and ribavirin needed early discontinuation of therapy due to SAEs, the most common cause being hematological disorders.

Key Words: Liver cirrhosis, Hepatitis C virus, Adverse events, Sustained virological response



INTRODUCTION

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a worldwide public health concern, affecting approximately 170 million people[1]. This condition is responsible for 25%-30% of global cases of cirrhosis and is the most common cause for liver transplantation[2]. Cirrhotic patients infected with HCV develop hepatic decompensation at a rate of 30% over 10 years and hepatocellular carcinoma at annual rates ranging from 3% to 8%[3,4].

In the last 10 years, pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and ribavirin became the standard of care (SOC) treatment in chronic HCV infection. The sustained virological response (SVR) rates range from 42% to 46% in patients with genotype 1 or 4 infection and from 76% to 82% in patients with genotype 2 or 3 infection[5-7]. In patients with liver cirrhosis, the SVR rate is even lower, at approximately 20% in genotype 1 or 4 infection and 55% in patients with genotype 2 or 3 infection[8]. Also, cirrhotic patients have a reduced tolerance to therapy[9,10] but the risk of further complications is smaller in patients who achieve SVR[11].

This systematic review aims to identify and analyze the severe adverse events (SAE) that lead to treatment discontinuation during treatment with PegIFN and ribavirin in cirrhotic patients infected with HCV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eligibility criteria

This review included all the studies published in English prior to December 2011 that evaluated SAEs in cirrhotic patients infected with HCV and treated with SOC therapy: PegIFN alpha 2a (dosage: 135-180 μg/wk) or PegIFN alpha 2b (dosage: 1 or 1.5 μg/kg per week) and ribavirin (dosage range: 800-1200 mg/d). Patients with genotype 1 + 4 underwent treatment for 48 wk, whereas those with genotypes 2 + 3 were treated for 24 wk. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was made either by liver biopsy or by clinical, ultrasonographic, endoscopic or laparoscopic signs of cirrhosis. Studies that included liver-transplanted patients or cases co-infected with hepatitis B virus or human immunodeficiency virus were excluded from the analysis.

Outcomes

The pre-specified primary outcome was the rate of SAEs (leading to treatment discontinuation) that occurred during treatment with PegIFN and ribavirin in cirrhotic patients infected with HCV.

The secondary outcomes were: description of SAEs; the possible relationships between SAE rates in cirrhotic patients and the following factors: decompensation of the disease (class Child-Pugh B or C), type of PegIFN (alpha 2a and alpha 2b) used in SOC therapy and HCV genotype; the proportion of patients in whom the medication dosage was reduced; and the SVR rate in cirrhotic patients, according to HCV genotype.

SVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA in serum by real-time polymerase chain reaction 6 mo after discontinuation of therapy.

Data sources and searches

Relevant studies published prior to December 2011 were searched in PubMed, Medline, Lilacs, Scopus, Ovid, EMBASE, Cochrane and Medscape databases using the following keywords: liver cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C, HCV, adverse events, sustained virological response, SVR.

Study selection and data collection

Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts for potential eligibility and the full texts for final eligibility. The following data were extracted: country of origin, year of publication, number of patients, age and weight of the patients, HCV genotype, the Child-Pugh class, the baseline treatment history (naive or previously treated), the treatment administered, the rate and description of SAEs that lead to treatment discontinuation, the proportion of patients in whom the doses of PegIFN and/or ribavirin were reduced, and the SVR rate according to HCV genotype.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis were carried out with the software package SPSS version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics (percentage, 95%CI) were calculated for each variable as appropriate. Standard binomial tests for differences in proportions were used to compare patient subgroups (“n” designates the total number of patients included in a particular subgroup). A P value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of 8793 titles identified during the initial search, 8764 were excluded based on one of the following reasons: data published only in abstract, duplicated titles, data on cirrhotic patients not presented, the treatment regimen did not include PegIFN in combination with ribavirin or the same author had several similar articles, but with a different number of patients (we selected the article with the higher number of patients if we did not receive the information regarding the number of patients included in two or more studies from the author). Twelve articles which presented data on cirrhotic patients were excluded for the following reasons: the dosage or treatment duration with PegIFN and ribavirin were not standard; liver-transplanted patients were included; and the study presented the follow-up of patients after SOC therapy, but not the SAE leading to the therapy discontinuation. Finally, seventeen papers with 1133 patients with HCV liver cirrhosis were retrieved for analysis[12-28] (Figure 1). The main characteristics of the studies included in this systematic review are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in the systematic analysis.
Ref.Study designNo. of patientsAge (yr)WeightHCV genotypeBaseline treatment historyChild-Pugh classTreatment
Syed et al[12]Retrospective cohort study10452 ± 7.682 ± 15 kg (mean weight)1, 2, 3Naive and previously treatedAPegylated interferon alpha 2a (180 μg/wk) or alpha 2b (1-1.5 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (800-1200 mg/d)
Butt et al[13]Prospective cohort study6646.2 ± 10.122.3 ± 3.1 kg/m² (mean BMI)3Naive and previously treatedA, BPegylated interferon alpha 2a (180 μg/wk) or alpha 2b (1 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (10-12 mg/kg per day)
Giannini et al[14]Retrospective cohort study8556 ± 9Not specified1, 2, 3, 4Naive and previously treatedA, BPegylated interferon alpha 2a (180 μg/wk) or alpha 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (800-1200 mg/ d)
Helbling et al[15]Randomized controlled trial (standard doses vs low doses)6447 (median age)74 kg (median weight)1, 2, 3, 4NaiveAPegylated interferon alpha 2a (180 μg/wk)
Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/ d)
Iacobellis et al[16]Prospective cohort study94Not specifiedNot specified1, 2, 3, 4NaiveBPegylated interferon alpha 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (800-1200 mg/d)
Roffi et al[17]Randomized controlled trial (pegylated interferon vs IFN standard)5756 (median age)75 kg (median weight)1, 2, 3NaiveAPegylated interferon alpha 2b (1 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (800-1200 mg/d)
Sood et al[18]Retrospective cohort study2848.3 ± 773.9 ± 11.2 kg (mean weight)3 (25/28 patients) and not specified for the other patientsNaiveA, BPegylated interferon alpha 2b (1 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (10-12 mg/kg per day)
Tekin et al[19]Cohort study2054.2 ± 5.9Not specified1Not specifiedA, BPegylated interferon alpha 2a (135 μg/wk)
Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d)
Moreno Planas et al[20]Cohort study1252 ± 8Not specified1, 3Naive and previously treatedA, BPegylated interferon alpha 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (10.6 mg/kg per day)
Di Marco et al[21]Randomized controlled trial (pegylated interferon alpha 2B + ribavirin vs pegylated interferon alpha 2b)5257 ± 6.671 ± 10.1 kg (mean weight)1, 2, 3, 4Naive and previously treatedA, BPegylated interferon alpha 2b (1 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (800 mg/d)
Höroldt et al[22]Retrospective cohort study61Not specifiedNot specified1, 2, 3NaiveA, BPegylated interferon alpha 2a or alpha 2b + ribavirin
Bruno et al[23]Randomized study106Not specifiedNot specified1, 2, 3, 4NaiveAPegylated interferon alpha 2a (180 μg/wk)
Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d)
Floreani et al[24]Prospective cohort study8755.7 ± 9.125.3 ± 3.1 kg/m² (mean BMI)1, 2, 3NaiveAPegylated interferon alpha 2b (80-100 μg/wk)
Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d)
Annicchiarico et al[25]Prospective cohort study1551.5Not specified1, 2, 3Naive and previously treatedB, CPegylated interferon alpha 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (800-1200 mg/d)
Aghemo et al[26]Prospective cohort study10657 ± 9.372.5 ± 11.8 kg (mean weight)1, 2, 3, 4NaiveAPegylated interferon alpha 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week)
Ribavirin (≥ 10.6 mg/kg per day)
Kim et al[27]Cohort study8656.4 ± 9.6Not specified1 and non-1Not specifiedAPegylated interferon alpha 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week)
or Pegylated interferon alpha 2a (180 μg/wk)
Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d)
Reiberger et al[28]Prospective cohort study9051 ± 826.6 ± 5 kg/m² (mean BMI)1, 2, 3, 4Not specifiedAPegylated interferon alpha 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week)
or pegylated interferon alpha 2a (180 μg/wk)
Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d)
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart of the selection of the studies. SOC: Standard of care; SAE: Severe adverse event.

In 165/1133 patients (14.5%), the antiviral treatment was stopped early due to SAEs. In 116/165 patients (70.3%), detailed information regarding the SAEs was presented. The most common SAEs leading to premature discontinuation of antiviral treatment in HCV cirrhotic patients were: severe thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia: n = 27 (23.2%); psychiatric disorders: n = 18 (15.5%); decompensation of liver cirrhosis: n = 14 (12.1%); and severe anemia: n = 13 (11.2%) (Table 2). The mortality rate in the cohort was 0.3% (4/1133 patients). The causes of death in the four patients were: severe sepsis, decompensation of heart disease, hepatocellular carcinoma and severe hepatic failure (this patient died 3 wk after stopping the treatment due to decompensation of liver cirrhosis).

Table 2 Description of severe adverse event leading to premature discontinuation of antiviral treatment in hepatitis C virus cirrhotic patients (%).
Name of severe adverse eventNo. of patient discontinuities
Severe thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia27 (23.2)
Psychiatric disorders (depression, psychosis, confusion, lethargy)18 (15.5)
Decompensation of liver cirrhosis (ascites with or without spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; jaundice; hepatic encephalopathy)14 (12.1)
Severe anemia13 (11.2)
Occurrence of malignancies6 (5.1) - 4 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 case of tongue carcinoma and 1 case of Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma recurrence
Allergic reactions to medication5 (4.3)
Severe infections5 (4.3)
Severe fatigue5 (4.3) - in 2 cases accompanied also by “flu-like” syndrome
Neurological disorders (stroke, polyneuropathy, hemiparesthesia)5 (4.3)
Heart disease (heart failure or acute coronary syndrome)3 (2.5)
Endocrinology disorders3 (2.5)
Diabetes decompensation2 (1.7)
Persistent fever2 (1.7)
Severe denutrition2 (1.7)
Aminotransferases flare1 (0.8)
Severe decrease of vision1 (0.8)
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding1 (0.8) - the cause of bleeding was not specified
Acute pancreatitis1 (0.8)
Severe flare of psoriasis1 (0.8)

Fifteen studies[12-24,27,28], including 154 patients in whom the antiviral treatment was stopped because of SAEs, presented information regarding the incidence of hematological SAEs. In 49/154 patients (31.8%), the antiviral treatment with PegIFN and ribavirin was stopped as result of severe anemia, thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia.

From ten studies[12,15-17,23-28], we extracted data regarding the SAEs leading to antiviral treatment discontinuation according to the Child-Pugh class. The SAEs rate was significantly higher in patients with Child-Pugh class B and C (n = 109) vs those with Child-Pugh class A (n = 700): 22% vs 11.4%, P = 0.003.

From eleven studies[15-21,23-26], we extracted data regarding the SAEs rate according to the type of PegIFN used in combination with ribavirin for treatment. The SAEs rate was similar for PegIFN alpha 2a (n = 190) and PegIFN alpha 2b (n = 451): 14.2% vs 13.7%, P = 0.96.

We were able to extract data regarding the rate of SAEs leading to early treatment discontinuation according to the HCV genotype from only three studies[13,18,29]. The SAEs rate was significantly higher in patients with genotype 1 (n = 20) vs those with genotype 3 (n = 94): 30% vs 8.5%, P = 0.02.

Five studies[13,15,16,18,25] presented data regarding the number of patients in whom the doses of PegIFN and/or ribavirin were reduced. From a total of 267 patients, the dosage for either drug was reduced in 87 (32.5%).

Eight studies[14,17,19,20,22,26-28] presented separately the number of patients in which the doses of antiviral medication were reduced: in 107/517 patients (20.6%) for PegIFN and for ribavirin in 141/517 patients (27.2%).

The overall SVR rate in the seventeen studies included in this systematic review was 37% (95%CI: 33.5-43.1). SVR rates were significantly higher in patients with genotype 2 + 3 (n = 495) compared to those with genotype 1 + 4 (n = 570): 56.5% (95%CI: 51.1-63.2) vs 20.5% (95%CI: 17.9-24.8), P < 0.0001.

DISCUSSION

Patients with HCV liver cirrhosis are a category of subjects difficult to treat due to the high risk of complications and the relatively low SVR rates. This systematic review summarizes and analyses the available data on the rates of SAEs leading to antiviral therapy discontinuation in cirrhotic patients infected with HCV. In 14.5% of the patients, treatment was discontinued due to SAEs, the most common of which were hematological disorders.

The proportion of cirrhotic patients presented in this systematic review in which the treatment was discontinued due to SAEs was higher than the proportion of patients with all stages of fibrosis in whom the treatment was discontinued due to SAEs presented in others studies. For example, in the study by Fried et al[29], only 32/453 patients (7%) discontinued their antiviral treatment due to SAEs. In the IDEAL study[7], 98/1016 patients (9.6%) treated with low doses of PegIFN alpha 2b (1 μg/kg per week) and ribavirin, 129/1019 patients (12.7%) treated with standard doses of PegIFN alpha 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week) and ribavirin and 135/1035 patients (13%) treated with standard doses of PegIFN alpha 2a (180 μg/wk) and ribavirin, had to discontinue their treatment as a result of SAEs developed during antiviral therapy.

In the present review, dose reduction of PegIFN was needed in 20.6% of patients and of ribavirin in 27.2%. These percentages were also higher than those presented in studies that included patients with all stages of fibrosis. In the study by Fried et al[29], the dose of PegIFN was reduced in 11% of patients and of ribavirin in 21%. In the IDEAL study[7], the dose of PegIFN was reduced in 6.9% of patients treated with low doses of PegIFN alpha 2b, in 10.1% of patients treated with standard doses of PegIFN alpha 2b and in 11.8% treated with standard doses of PegIFN alpha 2a. The dose of ribavirin was reduced in 16.7%, 18.4% and 17.4% of patients, respectively, included in the three arms of the IDEAL study.

In our review, the proportion of patients in whom the treatment had to be discontinued due to SAEs was significantly higher in patients with Child-Pugh class B and C vs those with Child-Pugh class A: 22% vs 11.4% (P = 0.003). The results are similar to those published in a review by Vezali et al[30], in which 20% of patients with decompensated liver disease and 12% with compensated cirrhosis needed to discontinue their therapy as result of SAEs. The proportion of drug discontinuation due to SAEs in cirrhotic patients with compensated liver disease vs those with less advanced liver disease was similar: 12% vs 13%. But the review by Vezali et al[30] also included decompensated cirrhotic patients treated with small doses of PegIFN[31], patients treated for a short period of time before or after liver transplantation[32,33], and patients with compensated liver cirrhosis treated only with PegIFN[34], while in our review, we included only cirrhotic patients in whom the dosage and the duration of therapy was standard.

The data analyzed in the present review showed a similar discontinuation rate due to SAEs in cirrhotic patients treated with PegIFN alpha 2a vs those treated with PegIFN alpha 2b (both in combination with ribavirin), similar to those obtained in the IDEAL study[7] (which included patients with all stages of fibrosis).

The discontinuation rate was significantly higher in patients with genotype 1 vs those with genotype 3, but this data could only be extracted from 3 studies. Also, in the only study which included genotype 1 patients[19], the majority of them were Child-Pugh class B (70%), while in one of the two studies which included only genotype 3 patients[15], most were Child-Pugh class A (92.4%). In the other study which includes only genotype 3 patients[18], data regarding the distribution of patients according to the Child-Pugh class is not presented. However, the discontinuation rate due to SAEs is probably higher in patients with genotype 1 + 4 than in those with genotype 2 + 3, in relationship to the longer period of time in which the patients could maintain the full dosing of antiviral medication. For example, in the study of Bruno et al[23], 86% of patients with genotype 2 + 3 maintained the full dosing and duration of therapy for PegIFN and 85% for ribavirin, while only 65% of patients with genotype 1 + 4 could maintain the full dosing of PegIFN and 56% for ribavirin. Another explanation is the longer duration of therapy for patients with genotype 1 + 4 (48 wk vs 24 wk).

Despite the low rate of SVR (especially in genotype 1 + 4), as well as the higher percentage of patients in whom the treatment is discontinued or the medication doses are reduced, Saab et al[35] demonstrated (using a Markov model) that treatment of patients with HCV genotype 1 liver cirrhosis (especially compensated) is cost effective. The study included approximately 4000 subjects followed over 17 years. Compared to the no-antiviral treatment strategy, treatment during compensated cirrhosis increased quality-adjusted life years by 0.950 and saved 55 314 dollars, while treatment during decompensated cirrhosis increased quality-adjusted life years by 0.044 and saved 5511 dollars. Also, treatment of patients with compensated cirrhosis resulted in 119 fewer deaths, 54 fewer hepatocellular carcinomas and 66 fewer transplants compared to the no-treatment strategy.

In recent years, several studies have used triple therapy (SOC therapy + direct antiviral agents) in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection; the most utilized direct antiviral agents are Telaprevir and Boceprevir[36-39]. This therapy could become the SOC in a short time.

There are few data regarding discontinuation rates of triple therapy as result of SAEs in cirrhotic patients. Only the RESPOND-2 trial[36] presented this kind of data. The percentage of patients in whom the antiviral therapy was discontinued due to SAEs was similar in SOC therapy vs triple therapy: 10% vs 15.3% (P = 0.93). Also, the proportion of patients in whom the doses had to be reduced was similar: 30% vs 33.3% (P = 0.85). But it should be noted that the number of cirrhotic patients was quite small: 10 patients treated with SOC therapy and 39 patients treated with triple therapy. If we consider all patients included in the RESPOND-2 trial[36], the percentage of patients in whom the treatment was stopped because of SAEs was much higher in patients treated with triple therapy than in those treated with SOC therapy: 8% and 12% (in the two arms which included patients treated with Boceprevir) vs 2%. Also, the proportion of patients in whom medication doses were reduced was higher in patients treated with triple therapy: 29% and 33% (in the two arms which included patients treated with Boceprevir) vs 14% (SOC therapy).

It is a known fact that one of the most common adverse events of Boceprevir treatment is anemia. In the SPRINT-2 trial[37], the proportion of patients in whom medication doses were reduced was much higher in patients treated with triple therapy vs those treated with SOC therapy: 21% vs 13%. It will be interesting to see the effect of triple therapy using Boceprevir as a direct antiviral agent in a large cohort of cirrhotic patients, knowing that SOC therapy needed to be discontinued due to severe hematological adverse events in 31.8% of patients in the present review. It should also be noted that erythropoietin was administered to correct anemia in the Boceprevir trials, while it was specified that the use of erythropoietin was allowed in only 5/17 of the studies included in the present review[12-14,16,18].

Also, the discontinuation rate as a result of SAEs was much higher in patients treated with triple therapy in the studies in which Telaprevir was used as a direct antiviral agent. In the REALIZE trial[38], the discontinuation rate due to SAEs was 3% for SOC therapy and 11% and 15%, respectively, in the two arms which used Telaprevir. In the PROVE 3 trial[39], 4% of patients treated by SOC therapy discontinued treatment as a result of SAEs, compared to 9%-26% of patients in whom Telaprevir was used as a direct antiviral agent.

In conclusion, 14.5% of cirrhotic patients treated with PegIFN and ribavirin needed early discontinuation of therapy because of SAEs, the most common cause being hematological disorders, while in approximately 30% of patients, the medication doses were reduced. Most likely these percentages will increase in the future with the use of direct antiviral agents. The overall SVR rate in cirrhotic patients included in this review was 37%; however, it was much lower in cases infected with HCV genotype 1 + 4 (20.5%).

COMMENTS
Background

Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver cirrhosis are difficult to treat. One of the reasons for this is the rate of severe adverse events (SAEs).

Research frontiers

In the last 10 years, pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and ribavirin have become the standard of care treatment in chronic HCV infection. In patients with liver cirrhosis, the sustained virological response (SVR) rate is even lower, at approximately 20% in genotype 1 or 4 infection and 55% in patients with genotype 2 or 3 infection. Also, cirrhotic patients have a reduced tolerance to therapy but the risk of further complications is smaller in patients who achieve SVR.

Innovations and breakthroughs

This systematic review aims to identify and analyze the SAEs that lead to treatment discontinuation during treatment with PegIFN and ribavirin in cirrhotic patients infected with HCV.

Peer review

The manuscript is very well written and makes clear conclusions about the risks of anti-viral treatment in patients with HCV related cirrhosis.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer Balaban YH S- Editor Song XX L- Editor Roemmele A E- Editor Li JY

References
1.  Global surveillance and control of hepatitis C. Report of a WHO Consultation organized in collaboration with the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board, Antwerp, Belgium. J Viral Hepat. 1999;6:35-47.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 512]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 475]  [Article Influence: 19.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2436-2441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Fattovich G, Giustina G, Degos F, Tremolada F, Diodati G, Almasio P, Nevens F, Solinas A, Mura D, Brouwer JT. Morbidity and mortality in compensated cirrhosis type C: a retrospective follow-up study of 384 patients. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:463-472.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1013]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 938]  [Article Influence: 34.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Natural history of hepatitis C. Clin Liver Dis. 2005;9:383-398.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 271]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 261]  [Article Influence: 13.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi VK, Shiffman M, Reindollar R, Goodman ZD, Koury K, Ling M, Albrecht JK. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;358:958-965.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4736]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4508]  [Article Influence: 196.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Hadziyannis SJ, Sette H, Morgan TR, Balan V, Diago M, Marcellin P, Ramadori G, Bodenheimer H, Bernstein D, Rizzetto M. Peginterferon-alpha2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:346-355.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  McHutchison JG, Lawitz EJ, Shiffman ML, Muir AJ, Galler GW, McCone J, Nyberg LM, Lee WM, Ghalib RH, Schiff ER. Peginterferon alfa-2b or alfa-2a with ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:580-593.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Bota S, Sporea I, Popescu A, Sirli R, Neghina AM, Danila M, Strain M. Response to standard of care antiviral treatment in patients with HCV liver cirrhosis - a systematic review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2011;20:293-298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Strader DB, Wright T, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2004;39:1147-1171.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1283]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1348]  [Article Influence: 67.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Wright TL. Treatment of patients with hepatitis C and cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2002;36:S185-S194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Veldt BJ, Heathcote EJ, Wedemeyer H, Reichen J, Hofmann WP, Zeuzem S, Manns MP, Hansen BE, Schalm SW, Janssen HL. Sustained virologic response and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:677-684.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Syed E, Rahbin N, Weiland O, Carlsson T, Oksanen A, Birk M, Davidsdottir L, Hagen K, Hultcrantz R, Aleman S. Pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients with Child-Pugh Class A liver cirrhosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:1378-1386.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Butt AS, Mumtaz K, Aqeel I, Shah HA, Hamid S, Jafri W. Sustained virological response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in patients with genotype 3 HCV cirrhosis. Trop Gastroenterol. 2009;30:207-212.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Giannini EG, Basso M, Savarino V, Picciotto A. Predictive value of on-treatment response during full-dose antiviral therapy of patients with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis and portal hypertension. J Intern Med. 2009;266:537-546.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Helbling B, Jochum W, Stamenic I, Knöpfli M, Cerny A, Borovicka J, Gonvers JJ, Wilhelmi M, Dinges S, Müllhaupt B. HCV-related advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis: randomized controlled trial of pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin. J Viral Hepat. 2006;13:762-769.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Iacobellis A, Siciliano M, Annicchiarico BE, Valvano MR, Niro GA, Accadia L, Caruso N, Bombardieri G, Andriulli A. Sustained virological responses following standard anti-viral therapy in decompensated HCV-infected cirrhotic patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:146-153.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Roffi L, Colloredo G, Pioltelli P, Bellati G, Pozzpi M, Parravicini P, Bellia V, Del Poggio P, Fornaciari G, Ceriani R. Pegylated interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin: an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment regimen for patients with hepatitis C virus related histologically proven cirrhosis. Antivir Ther. 2008;13:663-673.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Sood A, Midha V, Sood N, Bansal M. Pegylated interferon alfa 2b and oral ribavirin in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2006;25:283-285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Tekin F, Gunsar F, Karasu Z, Akarca U, Ersoz G. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pegylated-interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin in HCV-related decompensated cirrhotics. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:1081-1085.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Moreno Planas JM, Rubio González E, Boullosa Graña E, Fernández Ruiz M, Jiménez Garrido M, Lucena de la Poza JL, Martínez Arrieta F, Molina Miliani C, Sánchez Turrión V, Cuervas-Mons Martínez V. Effectiveness of pegylated interferon and ribavirin in patients with liver HCV cirrhosis. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:1482-1483.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Di Marco V, Almasio PL, Ferraro D, Calvaruso V, Alaimo G, Peralta S, Di Stefano R, Craxì A. Peg-interferon alone or combined with ribavirin in HCV cirrhosis with portal hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2007;47:484-491.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 81]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Höroldt B, Haydon G, O’Donnell K, Dudley T, Nightingale P, Mutimer D. Results of combination treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C infection. Liver Int. 2006;26:650-659.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Bruno S, Shiffman ML, Roberts SK, Gane EJ, Messinger D, Hadziyannis SJ, Marcellin P. Efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin in hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2010;51:388-397.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 130]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 132]  [Article Influence: 9.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Floreani A, Baldo V, Rizzotto ER, Carderi I, Baldovin T, Minola E. Pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for naive patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:734-737.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Annicchiarico BE, Siciliano M, Avolio AW, Caracciolo G, Gasbarrini A, Agnes S, Castagneto M. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2008;40:1918-1920.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Aghemo A, Rumi MG, Monico S, Prati GM, D’Ambrosio R, Donato MF, Colombo M. The pattern of pegylated interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin treatment failure in cirrhotic patients depends on hepatitis C virus genotype. Antivir Ther. 2009;14:577-584.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Kim KH, Jang BK, Chung WJ, Hwang JS, Kweon YO, Tak WY, Lee HJ, Lee CH, Suh JI. Peginterferon alpha and ribavirin combination therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus-related liver cirrhosis. Korean J Hepatol. 2011;17:220-225.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Reiberger T, Rutter K, Ferlitsch A, Payer BA, Hofer H, Beinhardt S, Kundi M, Ferenci P, Gangl A, Trauner M. Portal pressure predicts outcome and safety of antiviral therapy in cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:602-608.e1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, Smith C, Marinos G, Gonçales FL, Häussinger D, Diago M, Carosi G, Dhumeaux D. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:975-982.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Vezali E, Aghemo A, Colombo M. A review of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in cirrhosis. Clin Ther. 2010;32:2117-2138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 85]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Crippin JS, McCashland T, Terrault N, Sheiner P, Charlton MR. A pilot study of the tolerability and efficacy of antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus-infected patients awaiting liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:350-355.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 269]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 273]  [Article Influence: 12.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Carrión JA, Martínez-Bauer E, Crespo G, Ramírez S, Pérez-del-Pulgar S, García-Valdecasas JC, Navasa M, Forns X. Antiviral therapy increases the risk of bacterial infections in HCV-infected cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation: A retrospective study. J Hepatol. 2009;50:719-728.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 154]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 153]  [Article Influence: 10.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Forns X, García-Retortillo M, Serrano T, Feliu A, Suarez F, de la Mata M, García-Valdecasas JC, Navasa M, Rimola A, Rodés J. Antiviral therapy of patients with decompensated cirrhosis to prevent recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2003;39:389-396.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 234]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 238]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Heathcote EJ, Shiffman ML, Cooksley WG, Dusheiko GM, Lee SS, Balart L, Reindollar R, Reddy RK, Wright TL, Lin A. Peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1673-1680.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Saab S, Hunt DR, Stone MA, McClune A, Tong MJ. Timing of hepatitis C antiviral therapy in patients with advanced liver disease: a decision analysis model. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:748-759.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Bacon BR, Gordon SC, Lawitz E, Marcellin P, Vierling JM, Zeuzem S, Poordad F, Goodman ZD, Sings HL, Boparai N. Boceprevir for previously treated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1207-1217.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Poordad F, McCone J, Bacon BR, Bruno S, Manns MP, Sulkowski MS, Jacobson IM, Reddy KR, Goodman ZD, Boparai N. Boceprevir for untreated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-1206.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Zeuzem S, Andreone P, Pol S, Lawitz E, Diago M, Roberts S, Focaccia R, Younossi Z, Foster GR, Horban A. Telaprevir for retreatment of HCV infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2417-2428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  McHutchison JG, Manns MP, Muir AJ, Terrault NA, Jacobson IM, Afdhal NH, Heathcote EJ, Zeuzem S, Reesink HW, Garg J. Telaprevir for previously treated chronic HCV infection. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1292-1303.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]