Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2011; 3(8): 205-210
Published online Aug 27, 2011. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v3.i8.205
Table 2 Randomized controlled trial controlled trial studies to assess pentoxifylline for treatment of acute alcoholic hepatitis
Ref.Sample sizeMean age (yr) males (%)Drug scheduleMain outcome/findingsSecondary findingsCauses of death
McHutchison et al[30] 1991122 (12 pentoxifylline)Not reportedPentoxifylline 400 mg tid× 10 dRenal impairment more with placebo (mean creatinine change -0.3 vs +2.1No difference on other biochemical parameters. Plasma tumor necrosis factor increased in controls only. Survival trend better with pentoxifylline (3 deaths vs 1 death)Not reported
Akriviadis et al[15] 2000101 (49 pentoxifylline)42 (71% males)Pentoxifylline 400 mg tid× 28 dMortality during the admission 25% vs 46% (P = 0.037)Age, creatinine at randomization, and pentoxifylline treatment predicted survival. Tumor necrosis factor levels were no different with pentoxifylline and placebo. However, among non-survivors tumor necrosis factor levels decreased more in pentoxifylline groupHepatorenal syndrome: treated vs untreated (50% vs 92%, P = 0.009)
Paladugu et al[31] 2006130 (14)50 (100%)PentoxifyllineMortality at 28 d: 29% vs 46% (P = 0.09). Time to death 21 d vs 18 d (P = 0.041)Tumor necrosis factor levels unchanged in both groupsHepatorenal syndrome: treated vs untreated (50% vs 86%, P = 0.1)
Sidhu et al[32] 2006150Not reportedPentoxifylline 400 mg tid× 28 dMortality at 28 d (24% vs 40%, P = NS)Pentoxifylline reduced creatinine, tumor necrosis factor, discriminant function index, prothrombin timeHepatorenal syndrome: treated vs untreated (83% vs 60%)
Lebrec et al[33] 20071132Not reportedPentoxifyllineMortality at 2 mo (14% vs 16%, P = 0.77) and at 6 mo (27% vs 31%, P = 0.3) were similarNo difference for serious adverse effects between the 2 groups. Subgroup with renal dysfunction also did not get benefit with pentoxifyllineNot reported