Guidelines For Clinical Practice
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2010; 2(7): 261-274
Published online Jul 27, 2010. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i7.261
Table 1 Most relevant prognostic studies in acute variceal bleeding published between 1999-2009
Authors (year)(Ref.)nUniversal antibiotic prophylaxisHemostatictreatmentEarly rebleeding/treatment failurePrognostic factors for rebleeding/treatment failureEarly mortalityPrognostic factors for early mortalityStatistical techniqueValidation of prognostic models
Ben Ari et al (1999)[13]529NoEST or VAD (+ EST if failure)224 (42%)Active bleeding at endoscopy, platelet count, time to admission, alcohol, heart rate, encephalopathy92 (17%)Encephalopathy, bilirubin, ascites, plasma urea, heart rate, 5 d failureCox regressionYes (bootstrapping)
Moitinho et al (1999)[14]65NoEST or VAD23 (35%)HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg6 (9%)Not reportedLogistic regressionNo
D’Amico et al (2003)[6]297NoVAD, Endoscopy or combination49 (15%)Child, portal vein thrombosis, AST, active bleeding, transfusion volume70 (21%)Encephalopathy, bilirubin, HCC, albuminLogistic regressionYes (split sample)
Thomopoulous et al (2003)[15]121NoVAD + EVL15 (10%)Not reported26 (18%)Child, shockLogistic regressionNo
Lecleire et al (2005)[16]275NoEndoscopyNot reportedNot reported107 (23%)Prothrombin time, digestive cancer, hematemesis, corticoids, age, in-patientsLogistic regressionNo
Abraldes et al (2008)[14]117YesVAD + Endoscopy18 (15%)HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg, shock, Child, non-alcoholic cirrhosis7 (6%)Not reportedLogistic regressionYes (bootstrapping)
Bambha et al (2008)[12]256YesEVL + (VAD or placebo)37 (15%)MELD ≥ 18, clot on varix35 (14%)MELD ≥ 18, transfusion volume, active bleeding at endoscopy, early rebleedingBivariate cox analysisNo
Augustin et al (2009)[5]267YesVAD + Endoscopy55 (21%)Not reported63 (24%)Child, infection, plasma creatinine, HCCLogistic regression + CART analysisYes (split sample)