Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 123580
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.123580
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.123580
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of patients in sub-study 2
| All (n = 16) | |
| Age (year), mean ± SD | 50.50 ± 10.73 |
| Male, n (%) | 13 (81.3) |
| HVPG, mean ± SD | 23.44 ± 4.29 |
| PPG, mean ± SD | 23.63 ± 4.22 |
| Etiology, n (%) | |
| HBV | 13 (81.3) |
| ALD | 3 (18.7) |
| Child-Pugh class, n (%) | |
| Class A | 9 (56.3) |
| Class B | 6 (37.5) |
| Class C | 1 (6.2) |
| Laboratory test, median (IQR) | |
| PLT (109/L) | 78.50 (90.5) |
| TBIL (μmol/L) | 26.00 (37.90) |
| Alb (g/L) | 33.90 (8.80) |
| PT (seconds) | 16.65 (1.50) |
- Citation: Huang YF, Wu XQ, Yang YD, Ke BL, Luo JN, Chang BY, Zhou CR, Huang XL, Pan XM, Lai XM, Zhang LJ, Wu C, Wu B. Effect of hepatic venous pressure gradient in different hepatic venous branches on assessing portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(8): 123580
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i8/123580.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.123580