BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 122926
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.122926
Table 2 Prognostic performance of non-invasive liver disease assessments for chronic kidney disease in metabolic associated steatotic liver disease patients (n = 922)
Scores
Cumulative CKD occurrence stage ≥ 3
1-year
2-year
3-year
4-year
5-year
NFS
    AUROC0.770.780.790.730.73
    (95%CI)(0.67-0.85)(0.71-0.85)(0.73-0.85)(0.65-0.81)(0.65-0.81)
    Standard cutoff values≥ -1.455≥ -1.455≥ -1.455≥ -1.455≥ -1.455
    Sensitivity (%)84.2188.2489.1379.3180.30
    Specificity (%)47.2147.7948.4747.8541.97
FIB-4
    AUROC0.720.760.770.700.73
    (95%CI)(0.61-0.80)(0.69-0.82)(0.70-0.82)(0.63-0.78)(0.65-0.79)
    Standard cutoff values≥ 1.30≥ 1.30≥ 1.30≥ 1.30≥ 1.30
    Sensitivity (%)73.6882.3582.6175.8674.24
    Specificity (%)53.3754.2054.5853.3141.45
LSM
    AUROC0.670.660.670.640.65
    (95%CI)(0.53-0.78)(0.56-0.75)(0.59-0.76)(0.56-0.72)(0.57-0.72)
    Standard cutoff values≥ 8.0≥ 8.0≥ 8.0≥ 8.0≥ 8.0
    Sensitivity (%)63.1664.7165.2262.0759.09
    Specificity (%)58.0657.5856.7155.7951.81
ALBI
    AUROC0.570.560.540.570.58
    (95%CI)(0.45-0.71)(0.48-0.65)(0.46-0.64)(0.48-0.67)(0.49-0.66)
    Standard cutoff values≥ -2.61≥ -2.61≥ -2.61≥ -2.61≥ -2.61
    Sensitivity (%)15.7917.6521.7425.8625.76
    Specificity (%)80.3579.0278.6277.6579.02
Comparison of AUROCa
    NFS vs FIB-40.1470.5210.3840.3290.838
    NFS vs LSM0.0590.012a0.008a0.034a0.038a
    NFS vs ALBI0.018a<0.001a<0.001a0.003a0.005a


Write to the Help Desk