Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 122692
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.122692
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.122692
Table 2 Comparison of body mass index, low body mass index, and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition-defined malnutrition among the three methods, n (%)/median (Q1, Q3)
| Outcome | Actual body weight method | CT-corrected method | CT-sensitive corrected method |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.22 (21.85, 26.15) | 23.67 (20.73, 25.48) | 23.39 (20.53, 25.48) |
| Low BMI | 6 (6.0) | 10 (10.0) | 12 (12.0) |
| GLIM-defined malnutrition | 19 (19.0) | 22 (22.0) | 24 (24.0) |
- Citation: Zhao HJ, Su LH, Lu FH, Gao F, Sai JH, Li P, Shi JL, Wang L, Li SJ, Zhou F, Zhou LM, Wang N, He PY. Computed tomography-based correction of the body mass index improves malnutrition detection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(7): 122692
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i7/122692.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.122692