Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 117157
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.117157
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.117157
Table 5 Compare the postoperative recovery conditions of the giant hepatic hemangioma and large hepatic hemangioma groups in the liver parenchymal group, mean ± SD/median (interquartile rage)
| GHH (n = 17) | LHH (n = 17) | t/Z/χ2 | P value | |
| Inflammatory | ||||
| WBC (109/L) | 9.58 ± 3.03 | 9.14 ± 2.84 | 0.441 | 0.662 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 85.00 (80.25-89.93) | 82.40 (73.75-89.70) | -1.051 | 0.293 |
| Liver function | ||||
| TB (μmol/L) | 42.61 ± 23.37 | 31.41 ± 10.21 | 1.809 | 0.080 |
| ALT (U/L) | 375.63 ± 157.13 | 378.32 ± 234.54 | -0.039 | 0.969 |
| AST (U/L) | 559.81 ± 257.56 | 479.50 ± 337.71 | 0.780 | 0.441 |
| GGT (U/L) | 41.00 (19.50-79.75) | 42.50 (25.75-63.00) | -0.689 | 0.491 |
| Renal function | ||||
| Cr (μmol/L) | 59.50 (52.60-65.50) | 58.1 (48.90-68.25) | -0.362 | 0.718 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 5.60 (3.33-12.38) | 3.35 (2.95-4.07) | -1.758 | 0.079 |
| Coagulation | ||||
| D-D (μg/L) | 1935.05 ± 1315.62 | 2403.25 ± 2441.19 | -1.003 | 0.596 |
| PT (seconds) | 12.58 ± 1.12 | 12.70 ± 0.85 | -0.449 | 0.793 |
| Perioperative | ||||
| Spent | 60716.60 (56261.64-62966.02) | 56527.12 (47523.46-60886.15) | -1.705 | 0.088 |
| Ablation time (minutes) | 43.71 ± 10.89 | 32.29 ± 8.29 | 3.438 | 0.002 |
| Exhaust time (day) | 2.00 (1.25-2.75) | 1.50 (1.00-2.00) | -2.925 | 0.003 |
| Surgical blood loss (mL) | 30.00 (6.25-50.00) | 15.00 (6.25-42.50) | -2.553 | 0.011 |
| Clinical stay (day) | 3.00 (2.00-4.00) | 3.00 (3.00-4.00) | -0.829 | 0.407 |
- Citation: Wu CL, Chen XC, Zhao W, Hu B, Huan HB, Tu YL, Zhu ZM, Jiang K. Laparoscopic microwave ablation for hepatic hemangiomas with different locations: A comparative study. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(5): 117157
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i5/117157.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.117157