BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 115456
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i4.115456
Table 2 Quality assessment of the studies included in the systematic review
Ref.
Study design
Assessment tools
Assessment results
Interpretation of results
Tarik Kani et al[3], 2021Retrospective studyNOS7 starsThe maximum total score is nine stars. A score of seven or more stars generally indicates high-quality research, while a score of five or six stars indicates medium quality, and a score of less than five stars indicates low quality
Youcheng et al[10], 2025Prospective studyNOS6 stars
Duman et al[11], 2016Retrospective studyNOS6 stars
Yilmaz et al[12], 2021Prospective studyNOS7 stars
Eren and Horsanali[13], 2019Cross-sectional studyAHRQ8 pointsThis standard comprises 11 items, each of which is answered with “Yes”, “No”, or “Uncertain”. A “Yes” response earns 1 point. A total score of 0-3 indicates low quality, 4-7 indicates medium quality, and 8-11 indicates high quality
Hasanain et al[14], 2017Cross-sectional studyAHRQ7 points
Ragab et al[15], 2024Observational studyAHRQ6 points


Write to the Help Desk