BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113743
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113743
Table 2 Non-invasive monitoring: How to deal with common pitfalls
Tool/scenario
Common pitfalls
What to do (mitigation)
When to escalate
Transient elastography/shearwave elastographyFalse-highs with acute inflammation, cholestasis, or postprandial state; obesity/central adiposity lowers reliability; device/probe cut-off variability; suboptimal IQR/medianRepeat in fasting state; use correct probe (XL if BMI/skin-capsule distance warrants); ensure quality metrics (e.g., IQR/median ≤ 30%, ≥ 10 valid shots); standardize device/protocol; interpret with ALT, platelets, clinical contextIf kPa remains high on repeat under proper conditions and discordant with labs/clinical picture - consider turnover panel or specialist review
Serum scores (FIB-4, APRI, ELF, PIIINP)Age-dependence; low PPV for moderate fibrosis in low-prevalence settings; systemic inflammation elevates components and may over-call riskUse rule-out/rule-in bands; re-test when disease activity is quiescent; combine with elastography for concordanceConcordant high risk across two modalities or rising trend despite risk optimization, escalate work-up or therapy discussion
Discordance managementEnzymes high but TE low; TE high with normal labsConsider MASLD activity, extrahepatic drivers, transient flares. Confirm fasting/probe; repeat TE; consider turnover markers before biopsyPersisting discordance after optimized repeats, and where biopsy would change management
Follow-up cadence/interpretationOver-reliance on single thresholds during changing clinical statusPrefer trendbased interpretation (bi-directional movement over time) with standardized timing/conditionsEscalate if sustained upward trends in TE and/or serum scores occur despite riskfactor optimization


Write to the Help Desk