©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113743
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113743
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113743
Table 2 Non-invasive monitoring: How to deal with common pitfalls
| Tool/scenario | Common pitfalls | What to do (mitigation) | When to escalate |
| Transient elastography/shearwave elastography | False-highs with acute inflammation, cholestasis, or postprandial state; obesity/central adiposity lowers reliability; device/probe cut-off variability; suboptimal IQR/median | Repeat in fasting state; use correct probe (XL if BMI/skin-capsule distance warrants); ensure quality metrics (e.g., IQR/median ≤ 30%, ≥ 10 valid shots); standardize device/protocol; interpret with ALT, platelets, clinical context | If kPa remains high on repeat under proper conditions and discordant with labs/clinical picture - consider turnover panel or specialist review |
| Serum scores (FIB-4, APRI, ELF, PIIINP) | Age-dependence; low PPV for moderate fibrosis in low-prevalence settings; systemic inflammation elevates components and may over-call risk | Use rule-out/rule-in bands; re-test when disease activity is quiescent; combine with elastography for concordance | Concordant high risk across two modalities or rising trend despite risk optimization, escalate work-up or therapy discussion |
| Discordance management | Enzymes high but TE low; TE high with normal labs | Consider MASLD activity, extrahepatic drivers, transient flares. Confirm fasting/probe; repeat TE; consider turnover markers before biopsy | Persisting discordance after optimized repeats, and where biopsy would change management |
| Follow-up cadence/interpretation | Over-reliance on single thresholds during changing clinical status | Prefer trendbased interpretation (bi-directional movement over time) with standardized timing/conditions | Escalate if sustained upward trends in TE and/or serum scores occur despite riskfactor optimization |
- Citation: Al-Hammada Y, Sharba S, Al-Dury S. Should the theory of methotrexate-induced liver toxicity be abandoned? World J Hepatol 2026; 18(2): 113743
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i2/113743.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113743