BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113743
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113743
Table 1 Published cohorts evaluating liver fibrosis in methotrexate-treated patients
Ref.
Number of patients
Findings
Risk of fibrosis
Aithal et al[1], 200469Fibrosis risk: 0% at 1500 mg, up to 32% at > 10000 mg; no correlation between cumulative dose and fibrosis progressionNo; no correlation between cumulative MTX dose and fibrosis progression (r = 0.052; P = 0.65)
Zachariae et al[2], 1980328 patients, 764 biopsiesCirrhosis in 6.4%; 25.6% in patients treated > 5 yearsYes; strong dose-response observed; fibrosis at doses < 2 g in some cases
Roenigk et al, 1982[3]Approximately 800 psoriasis patients (summary of multiple biopsy series)24%-34% any fibrosis; approximately 3% cirrhosis overall (0%-6% across series); higher rates only at > 4 gModerate fibrosis in historical high-dose cohorts; advanced fibrosis rare and concentrated in high-dose + risk-factor patients
Chalmers et al[4], 200525311 biopsied due to elevated PIIINP; 3 mild fibrosis, similar rate to routine biopsy controlsLow overall risk with once-weekly MTX regimens under PIIINP monitoring
Berends et al[5], 200724Fibrosis: F0 (21%), F1 (54%), F2 (17%), F3-F4 (8%); FibroTest and FibroScan effectively identify fibrosis; no clear MTX dose associationNo; no clear association between cumulative MTX dose and presence of fibrosis
Bray et al[6], 2012219.5% liver fibrosis (F3); 90.5% had NAFLD/NASHIt was difficult to determine whether the fibrosis was due to MTX itself or a combination with NAFLD/metabolic syndrome
Kim et al[7], 20151854.9% had liver stiffness > 8.6 kPa; no significant correlation with MTX dose, but high BMI correlatedNo; only a high body mass index but not the cumulative MTX dose was associated with substantial liver fibrosis
Atallah et al[8], 2023999Elevated liver stiffness in 15.3%; elevated ELF in 29.4%. No significant association with cumulative MTX dose or duration. Fibrosis strongly linked to metabolic factors (BMI, diabetes), not MTXLow (MTX risk likely overestimated)
Gelfand et al[9], 202140237 (PsO 5687; PsA 6520; RA 28030)PsO/PsA MTX users had higher rates of liver disease and cirrhosis than RA MTX users; differences persisted after adjustment for MTX dose and comorbidities; RA had highest cumulative dose but lowest liver diseaseHigher liver disease/cirrhosis risk in PsO/PsA vs RA, independent of MTX dose; supports role of underlying disease/metabolic factors rather than intrinsic MTX fibrogenicity
European Association for the Study of the Liver et al[12], 2016Not applicable (clinical guideline)MTX is not identified as a primary hepatotoxic agent in NAFLDMTX not considered a relevant risk factor for fibrosis in this guidance
Chalasani et al[10], 2018Not applicable (clinical guideline)Methotrexate is not identified as a primary cause of fibrosis in NAFLDMTX not listed among hepatotoxic agents relevant to NAFLD progression
Lertnawapan et al[13], 2019108Mild/moderate fibrosis in 10.3%; safe short-term MTX useYes; the study shows that MTX itself is an independent risk factor for liver fibrosis, but that the risks are amplified by concurrent metabolic influence (obesity, fatty liver)
Pongpit et al[14], 2016165Significant fibrosis in 10.9%; no correlation with cumulative MTX dose; associated with metabolic factorsNo
Martyn-Simmons et al[15], 201427Mild fibrosis: 63%, moderate to severe: 11%, cumulative dose (mean): 7530 mgMethotrexate-induced liver fibrosis remains a complication that can limit the use of methotrexate for psoriasis
Maybury et al[16], 2014429 patients (from 8 biopsy-based studies)Pooled RD: 22% for any fibrosis, 9% for significant fibrosis, 4% for cirrhosisYes - increased fibrosis risk; no clear dose-effect; limited by study heterogeneity
Weinblatt et al[17], 1992260% fibrosis at 24 months; mild fibrosis in 1 patient at 48 months and 72 monthsNo, low; “there have been no cases of either moderate fibrosis or cirrhosis in this cohort”. “Results from the liver biopsies are reassuring”
Arias et al[18], 199316Fibrosis in 9.1% biopsies; 1 mild, 1 moderate-severeNo, “those patients with the shortest duration of therapy were actually those with the most severe liver abnormalities on biopsy, although this inverse relationship was not statistically significant”
Boffa et al[19], 19968721% fibrosis, 4% cirrhosis, 30% inflammation at initial biopsyLow, “the risk of significant liver damage from low-dose, once-weekly MTX therapy for psoriasis is low”
Richard et al[20], 20005733.8% mild fibrosis by Roenigk; 94.6% fibrosis (48.6% mild, 41.8% moderate, 4% severe) by SSS. No progression at 2 g cumulative MTX doseNo, “neither the Roenigk score nor the SSS demonstrated any progression of hepatic fibrosis in patients having received 2 g of MTX, or showing abnormal levels of transaminases”
Lémann et al[21], 20004911 biopsied; 3 normal, 5 mild steatosis, 1 mild portal fibrosis, no advanced fibrosis over median 18 monthsNo, MTX-related liver fibrosis was rare and mild in this cohort. No progressive or advanced fibrosis was reported, despite MTX use over a median of 18 months (range 7-59 months)
Maurice et al[22], 200538Fibrosis in 13% patients; progression in 16% paired biopsies at median dose of 5960 mgLow overall fibrosis risk under modern weekly low-dose regimens: Median cumulative MTX dose at time of fibrotic biopsy: 5960 mg; whole cohort median: 2740 mg; advanced fibrosis was more likely in patients with: Higher cumulative MTX dose
Laharie et al[23], 2006621 cirrhosis, 3 mild fibrosis; no difference by MTX doseNo, “there was no significant difference between patients in group 1 (high dose) and group 2 (naive) and the two groups were comparable according to the CDAI”
Halonen et al[24], 20061619% mild fibrosis; no dose-response relationship with MTXNo, “no minimum cumulative MTX dose as a potential indicator for liver fibrosis was detected”. “MTX or its metabolites did not predict histological liver disease”
Carneiro et al[25], 200813Minimal fibrosis < 2 g cumulative MTX; increased fibrosis ≥ 3 g cumulative doseYes, low risk up to 2 g cumulative MTX dose - no clear signs of new or advanced fibrosis. Increased risk at ≥ 3 g - several patients developed portal fibrosis, fibrous septa, and regenerative nodules
Arena et al[26], 2012100Liver stiffness strongly correlated with cumulative MTX dose; fibrosis observed with doses > 4000 mg and LS > 9 kPaYes, increased liver stiffness was clearly correlated with higher cumulative MTX dose, even after adjustment for other factors. Fibrosis was only detected in patients with LS > 9 kPa and high MTX dose (> 4000 mg)
Barbero-Villares et al[27], 201249Advanced fibrosis in 7.5%; no association with MTX duration or cumulative doseNo, “regarding LF development, MTX therapy is safe”
Dubey et al[28], 2016204Biopsy-confirmed fibrosis in 2 patients (1%); no correlation with cumulative MTX dose up to 8 gNo, no statistical association between MTX dose and liver damage, even at doses up to approximately 8 g
Bordbar et al[29], 201878MTX use not associated with increased fibrosis risk; no difference with chronic hepatitisNo
Cervoni et al[30], 2020131Higher cumulative MTX dose independently associated with fibrosis; amplified risk with obesity/fatty liverYes
Rivera et al[31], 2022457Hepatic steatosis in 64.1%; advanced fibrosis risk in 26.2%-37.2%, significantly correlated with longer MTX exposure, metabolic syndrome, and alcohol useModerate (increases with treatment duration)
Wong et al[32], 2024228Significant fibrosis in 26.5%; correlated with obesity and diabetes, not MTX dose/durationNo, “liver fibrosis was not correlated with the total cumulative dose of MTX or duration of MTX use, but was significantly correlated with obesity and diabetes status”


Write to the Help Desk