©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113743
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113743
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113743
Table 1 Published cohorts evaluating liver fibrosis in methotrexate-treated patients
| Ref. | Number of patients | Findings | Risk of fibrosis |
| Aithal et al[1], 2004 | 69 | Fibrosis risk: 0% at 1500 mg, up to 32% at > 10000 mg; no correlation between cumulative dose and fibrosis progression | No; no correlation between cumulative MTX dose and fibrosis progression (r = 0.052; P = 0.65) |
| Zachariae et al[2], 1980 | 328 patients, 764 biopsies | Cirrhosis in 6.4%; 25.6% in patients treated > 5 years | Yes; strong dose-response observed; fibrosis at doses < 2 g in some cases |
| Roenigk et al, 1982[3] | Approximately 800 psoriasis patients (summary of multiple biopsy series) | 24%-34% any fibrosis; approximately 3% cirrhosis overall (0%-6% across series); higher rates only at > 4 g | Moderate fibrosis in historical high-dose cohorts; advanced fibrosis rare and concentrated in high-dose + risk-factor patients |
| Chalmers et al[4], 2005 | 253 | 11 biopsied due to elevated PIIINP; 3 mild fibrosis, similar rate to routine biopsy controls | Low overall risk with once-weekly MTX regimens under PIIINP monitoring |
| Berends et al[5], 2007 | 24 | Fibrosis: F0 (21%), F1 (54%), F2 (17%), F3-F4 (8%); FibroTest and FibroScan effectively identify fibrosis; no clear MTX dose association | No; no clear association between cumulative MTX dose and presence of fibrosis |
| Bray et al[6], 2012 | 21 | 9.5% liver fibrosis (F3); 90.5% had NAFLD/NASH | It was difficult to determine whether the fibrosis was due to MTX itself or a combination with NAFLD/metabolic syndrome |
| Kim et al[7], 2015 | 185 | 4.9% had liver stiffness > 8.6 kPa; no significant correlation with MTX dose, but high BMI correlated | No; only a high body mass index but not the cumulative MTX dose was associated with substantial liver fibrosis |
| Atallah et al[8], 2023 | 999 | Elevated liver stiffness in 15.3%; elevated ELF in 29.4%. No significant association with cumulative MTX dose or duration. Fibrosis strongly linked to metabolic factors (BMI, diabetes), not MTX | Low (MTX risk likely overestimated) |
| Gelfand et al[9], 2021 | 40237 (PsO 5687; PsA 6520; RA 28030) | PsO/PsA MTX users had higher rates of liver disease and cirrhosis than RA MTX users; differences persisted after adjustment for MTX dose and comorbidities; RA had highest cumulative dose but lowest liver disease | Higher liver disease/cirrhosis risk in PsO/PsA vs RA, independent of MTX dose; supports role of underlying disease/metabolic factors rather than intrinsic MTX fibrogenicity |
| European Association for the Study of the Liver et al[12], 2016 | Not applicable (clinical guideline) | MTX is not identified as a primary hepatotoxic agent in NAFLD | MTX not considered a relevant risk factor for fibrosis in this guidance |
| Chalasani et al[10], 2018 | Not applicable (clinical guideline) | Methotrexate is not identified as a primary cause of fibrosis in NAFLD | MTX not listed among hepatotoxic agents relevant to NAFLD progression |
| Lertnawapan et al[13], 2019 | 108 | Mild/moderate fibrosis in 10.3%; safe short-term MTX use | Yes; the study shows that MTX itself is an independent risk factor for liver fibrosis, but that the risks are amplified by concurrent metabolic influence (obesity, fatty liver) |
| Pongpit et al[14], 2016 | 165 | Significant fibrosis in 10.9%; no correlation with cumulative MTX dose; associated with metabolic factors | No |
| Martyn-Simmons et al[15], 2014 | 27 | Mild fibrosis: 63%, moderate to severe: 11%, cumulative dose (mean): 7530 mg | Methotrexate-induced liver fibrosis remains a complication that can limit the use of methotrexate for psoriasis |
| Maybury et al[16], 2014 | 429 patients (from 8 biopsy-based studies) | Pooled RD: 22% for any fibrosis, 9% for significant fibrosis, 4% for cirrhosis | Yes - increased fibrosis risk; no clear dose-effect; limited by study heterogeneity |
| Weinblatt et al[17], 1992 | 26 | 0% fibrosis at 24 months; mild fibrosis in 1 patient at 48 months and 72 months | No, low; “there have been no cases of either moderate fibrosis or cirrhosis in this cohort”. “Results from the liver biopsies are reassuring” |
| Arias et al[18], 1993 | 16 | Fibrosis in 9.1% biopsies; 1 mild, 1 moderate-severe | No, “those patients with the shortest duration of therapy were actually those with the most severe liver abnormalities on biopsy, although this inverse relationship was not statistically significant” |
| Boffa et al[19], 1996 | 87 | 21% fibrosis, 4% cirrhosis, 30% inflammation at initial biopsy | Low, “the risk of significant liver damage from low-dose, once-weekly MTX therapy for psoriasis is low” |
| Richard et al[20], 2000 | 57 | 33.8% mild fibrosis by Roenigk; 94.6% fibrosis (48.6% mild, 41.8% moderate, 4% severe) by SSS. No progression at 2 g cumulative MTX dose | No, “neither the Roenigk score nor the SSS demonstrated any progression of hepatic fibrosis in patients having received 2 g of MTX, or showing abnormal levels of transaminases” |
| Lémann et al[21], 2000 | 49 | 11 biopsied; 3 normal, 5 mild steatosis, 1 mild portal fibrosis, no advanced fibrosis over median 18 months | No, MTX-related liver fibrosis was rare and mild in this cohort. No progressive or advanced fibrosis was reported, despite MTX use over a median of 18 months (range 7-59 months) |
| Maurice et al[22], 2005 | 38 | Fibrosis in 13% patients; progression in 16% paired biopsies at median dose of 5960 mg | Low overall fibrosis risk under modern weekly low-dose regimens: Median cumulative MTX dose at time of fibrotic biopsy: 5960 mg; whole cohort median: 2740 mg; advanced fibrosis was more likely in patients with: Higher cumulative MTX dose |
| Laharie et al[23], 2006 | 62 | 1 cirrhosis, 3 mild fibrosis; no difference by MTX dose | No, “there was no significant difference between patients in group 1 (high dose) and group 2 (naive) and the two groups were comparable according to the CDAI” |
| Halonen et al[24], 2006 | 16 | 19% mild fibrosis; no dose-response relationship with MTX | No, “no minimum cumulative MTX dose as a potential indicator for liver fibrosis was detected”. “MTX or its metabolites did not predict histological liver disease” |
| Carneiro et al[25], 2008 | 13 | Minimal fibrosis < 2 g cumulative MTX; increased fibrosis ≥ 3 g cumulative dose | Yes, low risk up to 2 g cumulative MTX dose - no clear signs of new or advanced fibrosis. Increased risk at ≥ 3 g - several patients developed portal fibrosis, fibrous septa, and regenerative nodules |
| Arena et al[26], 2012 | 100 | Liver stiffness strongly correlated with cumulative MTX dose; fibrosis observed with doses > 4000 mg and LS > 9 kPa | Yes, increased liver stiffness was clearly correlated with higher cumulative MTX dose, even after adjustment for other factors. Fibrosis was only detected in patients with LS > 9 kPa and high MTX dose (> 4000 mg) |
| Barbero-Villares et al[27], 2012 | 49 | Advanced fibrosis in 7.5%; no association with MTX duration or cumulative dose | No, “regarding LF development, MTX therapy is safe” |
| Dubey et al[28], 2016 | 204 | Biopsy-confirmed fibrosis in 2 patients (1%); no correlation with cumulative MTX dose up to 8 g | No, no statistical association between MTX dose and liver damage, even at doses up to approximately 8 g |
| Bordbar et al[29], 2018 | 78 | MTX use not associated with increased fibrosis risk; no difference with chronic hepatitis | No |
| Cervoni et al[30], 2020 | 131 | Higher cumulative MTX dose independently associated with fibrosis; amplified risk with obesity/fatty liver | Yes |
| Rivera et al[31], 2022 | 457 | Hepatic steatosis in 64.1%; advanced fibrosis risk in 26.2%-37.2%, significantly correlated with longer MTX exposure, metabolic syndrome, and alcohol use | Moderate (increases with treatment duration) |
| Wong et al[32], 2024 | 228 | Significant fibrosis in 26.5%; correlated with obesity and diabetes, not MTX dose/duration | No, “liver fibrosis was not correlated with the total cumulative dose of MTX or duration of MTX use, but was significantly correlated with obesity and diabetes status” |
- Citation: Al-Hammada Y, Sharba S, Al-Dury S. Should the theory of methotrexate-induced liver toxicity be abandoned? World J Hepatol 2026; 18(2): 113743
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i2/113743.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113743