©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113464
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113464
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113464
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients among the two groups
| ESWL group (n = 387) | LL group (n = 71) | P value | |
| Mean age, years | 53.8 ± 15.7 | 55.0 ± 15.4 | 0.49 |
| Males/females, % | 58.7/41.3 | 64.8/35.2 | 0.20 |
| Number of CBD stones: 1/2/multiple, % | 46.8/3.4/49.8 | 50.7/5.6/43.6 | 0.30 |
| Mirrizzi syndrome | 35 (9.0) | 7 (9.9) | 0.40 |
- Citation: Singla N, Venkata KA, Inavolu P, Memon SF, Koduri KK, Singh AP, Katamareddy T, Darisetty S, Koppoju V, Jagtap N, Kalpala R, Lakhtakia S, Ramchandani M, Tandan M, Reddy DN. Advances in biliary stone management: Latest-generation extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy vs laser lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(2): 113464
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i2/113464.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113464