BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Prospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 124666
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.124666
Table 2 Comparison of baseline parameters between patients with and without fecal pathobionts, n (%)/median (range)
Baseline parameters
Pts with pathobionts (n = 20)
Pts without pathobionts (n = 5)
P value
Age, years61 (40-76)66 (65-75)NS
Sex, males17 (85)4 (80)NS
Etiology
HBV01 (20)NS
HCV3 (15)2 (40)NS
MetALD12 (70)1 (20)NS
MASLD01 (20)NS
MELD 9 (7-23)9 (8-10)NS
PH features
No EV1 (17)0NS
EV F111 (50)3 (60)NS
EV F26 (33)1 (20)NS
Previous EVL2 (17)1 (20)NS
Total bilirubin, mg/dL1.1 (0.7-10)1.3 (1.2-2.0)NS
AST, U/L25 (21-69)26 (23-27)NS
ALT, U/L22 (17-56)27 (22-29)NS
GGT, U/L60 (27-551)20 (20-26)NS
Platelet, n/μL67 × 103 (32-222 × 103)73 × 103 (55-79 × 103)NS
T2DM17 (85)0< 0.01a
BMI31 (24-46)25.5 (23-27)NS
Splenomegaly120 (100)5 (100)NS
Liver elastography (kPa)23 (11-64)17 (11-37)NS


Write to the Help Desk