©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 114366
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.114366
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.114366
Table 2 Comparison of psychological distress, anxiety, and depression scores between groups, median (interquartile range)/mean ± SD
| Group | n | Psychological distress score | Anxiety score | Depression score | |||
| Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | ||
| Intervention | 50 | 4 (4-5) | 3 (2-3) | 47.95 ± 5.33 | 41.65 ± 4.29 | 53.96 ± 4.82 | 45.79 ± 3.25 |
| Control | 50 | 4 (4-5) | 3 (3-4) | 48.54 ± 4.23 | 46.38 ± 4.18 | 53.32 ± 4.47 | 50.14 ± 3.69 |
| Z/t | Z = -0.807 | Z = -5.771 | t = -0.618 | t = -5.583 | t = 0.677 | t = -6.25 | |
| P value | 0.420 | 0.000 | 0.538 | 0.000 | 0.500 | 0.000 | |
- Citation: Xu WY, Li YQ, Wei XP, Qin HP, Feng LF. Evaluation of the impact of an interdisciplinary team scheduling model on psychological outcomes in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(1): 114366
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i1/114366.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.114366