©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 111902
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111902
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111902
Figure 2 Artificial intelligence readiness pyramid and trustworthiness Venn diagram.
The artificial intelligence (AI) readiness pyramid can be conceptualized in four ascending tiers. At the base lies the proof-of-concept phase, where algorithms are developed and validated in silico or on retrospective datasets. The “Trustworthiness” tier highlights the essential requirement for generalizability, interpretability, and ethical alignment - illustrated through the adjacent Venn diagram. The overlap of these three elements defines an AI system’s trustworthiness, which is a prerequisite for safe and responsible clinical deployment. The clinical testing level represents, encompassing prospective studies and real-world validation. The top tier signifies Routine Integration, where AI systems are seamlessly embedded into clinical workflows and used in daily practice.
- Citation: Boutos P, Karakasi KE, Katsanos G, Antoniadis N, Kofinas A, Tsoulfas G. Harnessing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology: Current applications and future perspectives. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(1): 111902
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i1/111902.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111902