©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 111534
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111534
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111534
Table 2 Parameters for noninvasive assessment of advanced fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
| NIM | Rule-in cutoff | Rule-out cutoff | AUROC1 | Strengths and limitations |
| Biomarkers | ||||
| APRI | < 0.5 | > 1.5 | 0.74 | False positive in patients with alternative causes of thrombocytopenia |
| FIB-4 | < 1.32; < 1.67 | ≥ 2.67; ≥ 3.483 | 0.84 | No added cost; low accuracy in patients younger than 35 years; low specificity in those older than 65 years |
| NFS | < -1.44 | ≥ 0.672 | 0.82 | No added cost; not accurate in age < 35 years, people with obesity and type 2 diabetes Restricted use to MASLD |
| ELF | < 7.7; < 7.73 | ≥ 9.8; ≥ 11.33 | 0.83 | Cost and not widely available; less useful for early fibrosis |
| Imaging techniques | ||||
| VCTE | < 8 kPa; < 8 kPa3 | ≥ 12 kPa; ≥ 20 kPa3 | 0.9 | Point of care, possibility of steatosis degree evaluation; necessity of specific device; confounded by active hepatitis, food intake, congestive heart failure, biliary obstruction, amyloidosis, ascites; less applicable and reliable in severe obesity (especially with M probe) |
| pSWE (ARFI) | < 1.3 m/second | > 2.1 m/second | 0.8-0.9 | Integration into conventional ultrasound systems, which enables a comprehensive evaluation of the liver at the same time; cut points not well validated; Probably affected by the same confounders as VCTE, though the success rate is higher than VCTE in obese patients |
| 2D-SWE | < 8 kPa | > 12 kPa | 0.80-0.98 | Integration into conventional ultrasound systems, which enables a comprehensive evaluation of the liver at the same time; cut points not well validated; probably affected by the same confounders as VCTE |
| MRE | < 2.55 kPa; < 3 kPa3 | ≥ 3.63kPa; ≥ 5 kPa3 | 0.89-0.96 | Superior performance in detecting early-stage fibrosis; integration into routine liver MRI allows both fibrosis staging and surveillance of other liver pathologies, such as HCC; cost, not widely available; probably affected by the same confounders as VCTE and iron content; some patients may have contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging or have claustrophobia |
- Citation: Ribeiro TCR, de Paula Boechat Soares V, Campos Fabri J, de Aragão Ramos LE. Noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(1): 111534
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i1/111534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111534