©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 111126
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.111126
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.111126
Table 2 Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve by bivariate analyses for different thresholds of the meta-analyzed scores
| Bivariate analysis | ||||||
| Score | Sensibility | Sensibility 95%CI | Specificity | Specificity 95%CI | AUC | AUC 95%CI |
| RETREAT ≥ 5 | 0.386 | 0.252-0.540 | 0.950 | 0.897-0.976 | 0.793 | 0.406-0.945 |
| RETREAT ≥ 4 | 0.601 | 0.443-0.740 | 0.861 | 0.759-0.924 | 0.807 | 0.611-0.880 |
| RETREAT ≥ 3 | 0.686 | 0.560-0.790 | 0.736 | 0.647-0.810 | 0.771 | 0.704-0.809 |
| PCRS ≥ 1 | 0.582 | 0.306-0.815 | 0.851 | 0.797-0.893 | 0.852 | 0.521-0.905 |
| PCRS ≥ 3 | 0.223 | 0.154-0.311 | 0.950 | 0.915-0.971 | 0.431 | 0.246-0.952 |
| Decaens ≥ 4 | 0.591 | 0.329-0.810 | 0.821 | 0.597-0.934 | 0.772 | 0.518-0.889 |
- Citation: Christofoli de Barros I, Vanzin Fernandes M, Rodríguez Villafuerte S, Brandão ABM. Explant-based prognostic models for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(9): 111126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i9/111126.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.111126