Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2025; 17(8): 107873
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.107873
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.107873
Table 1 Summary of the papers regarding the comparison between transarterial radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization
Ref. | Main aim | Main findings |
Salem et al[72] | Glass Y90 TARE (24 pt) vs cTACE (21 pt) | Time to progression: 26 vs 6.8 months (P = 0.0012) |
TRACE[73] | Glass Y90 TARE (38 pt) vs DEB-TACE (34 pt) | Median OS: 30.2 months vs 15.6 months |
Padia et al[74] | Segmental TARE (104 pt) vs TACE (138) | Overall complete response rate: 84% vs 58% (P < 0.001) |
Median PFS: 564 days vs 271 days (P = 0.002, adjusted P > 0.001) | ||
OS: 1198 days vs 1043 days (P = 0.35, adjusted P = 0.064) | ||
Biederman et al[75] | Radiation segmentectomy (112 pt) vs TACE (55 pt) | Overall complete response rate: 92.1% vs 52.6% (P = 0.005) |
Median time to secondary therapy: 812 days vs 161 days (P = 0.001) |
- Citation: Cortese F, Anagnostopoulos F, Bazzocchi MV, Caringi S, Pisani AR, Renzulli M, Paraskevopoulos I, Laera L, Surgo A, Spiliopoulos S, Memeo R, Inchingolo R. Modern approach to hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(8): 107873
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i8/107873.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.107873