Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2025; 17(8): 107873
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.107873
Table 1 Summary of the papers regarding the comparison between transarterial radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization
Ref.
Main aim
Main findings
Salem et al[72]Glass Y90 TARE (24 pt) vs cTACE (21 pt)Time to progression: 26 vs 6.8 months (P = 0.0012)
TRACE[73]Glass Y90 TARE (38 pt) vs DEB-TACE (34 pt)Median OS: 30.2 months vs 15.6 months
Padia et al[74]Segmental TARE (104 pt) vs TACE (138)Overall complete response rate: 84% vs 58% (P < 0.001)
Median PFS: 564 days vs 271 days (P = 0.002, adjusted P > 0.001)
OS: 1198 days vs 1043 days (P = 0.35, adjusted P = 0.064)
Biederman et al[75]Radiation segmentectomy (112 pt) vs TACE (55 pt)Overall complete response rate: 92.1% vs 52.6% (P = 0.005)
Median time to secondary therapy: 812 days vs 161 days (P = 0.001)