Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 106182
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.106182
Table 1 Assessment methods for sarcopenia
Method
Measurement
Description
Advantages
Disadvantages
HGSMuscle strength (kg)Uses a dynamometer to measure hand grip force, indicating overall muscle strengthSimple, non-invasive, and cost-effective; strong correlation with overall muscle functionAffected by motivation, hand injuries, and neurological conditions
Gait speedWalking speed (meter/second)Measures the time taken to walk a set distance (e.g., 4-6 meters), assessing mobilityQuick and easy to perform; predictive of disability and mortalityInfluenced by joint pain, neurological conditions, and cardiovascular fitness
SPPBComposite score (0-12)Includes balance, gait speed, and chair stand tests to assess lower limb functionComprehensive evaluation; predicts adverse outcomesRequires trained personnel and space for testing
Chair stand testTime to complete 5 sit-to-stand repetitions (second)Evaluates lower limb strength by timing how long a person takes to rise from a chair without arm supportFunctional test; easy to administerAffected by arthritis, balance disorders, and pain
DXAALM in kg/m²Measures muscle mass through low-dose X-ray imaging, considered a gold standardAccurate, reliable, and widely used in researchExpensive; limited availability in clinical settings
BIASMIUses electrical currents to estimate body composition, including muscle massPortable, affordable, and non-invasiveLess accurate in patients with fluid imbalances
CT/MRICross-sectional muscle area and densityDirectly visualizes muscle tissue and fat infiltration in specific body regionsHighly precise and can assess muscle qualityExpensive; CT involves radiation exposure