Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 104041
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.104041
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.104041
Figure 4 Calibration plots evaluating the predictive accuracy of seven staging and scoring systems for hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis.
A and B: Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging system; C and D: Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system (9-tier); E and F: HKLC staging system (5-tier); G and H: Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score; I and J: Italian Liver Cancer staging system; K and L: Japan Integrated staging score; M and N: Tokyo score for hepatocellular carcinoma; O and P: Model to estimate survival in ambulatory hepatocellular carcinoma patients; A, C, E, G, I, K, M and O: At 12 months; B, D, F, H, J, L, N and P: At 36 months. BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; HKLC: Hong Kong Liver Cancer; CLIP: Cancer of the Liver Italian program; ITA.LI.CA: Italian Liver Cancer; JIS: Japan Integrated staging; MESIAH: Model to estimate survival in ambulatory hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
- Citation: Mai-Phan TA, Nguyen TK, Pham TN, Tran MQ, Le KL. Comparative prognostic performance of staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from a Vietnamese cohort study. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(5): 104041
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i5/104041.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.104041