BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 110946
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i11.110946
Table 2 Comparative studies assessing liver cellularity in classic autoimmune hepatitis vs drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis
Ref.
Design and cohort
Main histological findings
Chung et al[19], 2024Retrospective cohort; 28 DI-ALH vs 39 idiopathic AIH casesDI-ALH exhibited significantly fewer plasma cell aggregates (61% vs 97%, P < 0.001), more eosinophilic aggregates (18% vs 3%), and lower portal inflammation and fibrosis (mean Ishak 1.9 vs 3.5)
de Boer et al[14], 2017Immunohistochemical profiling of autoimmune-DILI, idiopathic AIH, viral hepatitisInfiltrates were predominantly CD8+ T cells across all groups. Idiopathic AIH showed significantly more CD20+ B cells and plasma cells compared to DILI-AILH, which had fewer of both
Tsutsui et al[27], 2020 Comparative clinicopathological study: Acute AIH vs DILI (Japan)Acute AIH demonstrated greater lobular necrosis, hepatocellular rosettes, and dense plasma-cell infiltrates than DILI (all P < 0.01), supporting these as discriminating features
Suzuki et al[12], 2011Histological scoring (DDWJ 2004) in AIH vs DILIAIH scored significantly higher for portal inflammation, interface hepatitis, and plasma-cell infiltration than DILI (P < 0.012), confirming DDW-J scale’s diagnostic value. DI-ALH often showed portal-lobular inflammation
Björnsson et al[13], 2022Systematic review of 186 DI-ALH case reportsDI-ALH often shows portal-lobular lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, hepatocyte rosettes, and focal necrosis, mirroring AIH histology


Write to the Help Desk