BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 110614
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i11.110614
Table 3 Key clinical trials evaluating selective internal radiation therapy (transarterial radioembolization) for hepatocellular carcinoma
Trial
Phase/design
Comparison
Primary endpoint
Results
Clinical insights
SARAHPhase III, open-label, randomized controlled trialSIRT (Y-90) vs SorafenibOverall survival (OS)OS: 8.0 months (SIRT) vs 9.9 months (Sorafenib)- no significant difference. Fewer AEs and better QoL in SIRT groupComparable efficacy with better safety; viable alternative in select patients
SIRveNIBPhase III, open-label, randomized controlled trialSIRT (Y-90) vs SorafenibOSOS: 8.8 months (SIRT) vs 10.0 months (Sorafenib) no significant difference. Grade ≥ 3 AEs: 27.7% (SIRT) vs 50.6% (Sorafenib)Reinforces safety advantage of SIRT; supports use in selected Asian patient populations
DOSISPHERE-01Phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trialPersonalized SIRT vs Standard-dose SIRTOSOS: 26.6 months (personalized) vs 10.7 months (standard) P = 0.009. Higher response rates; some downstaged to surgeryPersonalized dosimetry improves outcomes; highlights need for tailored treatment planning


Write to the Help Desk