BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 110614
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i11.110614
Table 2 Transarterial chemoembolization-based combination therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus
Ref.
Population
Treatment arms
ORR (%)
Median OS (months)
Median PFS (months)
Key findings
Yuan et al[5]743 HCC with PVTTTACE + HAIC + TKIs + PD-1 vs TACE53.7 vs 7.8Not reached vs 10.414.8 vs 2.3Best surgical conversion and pCR outcomes
You et al[38]265 HCC with PVTTIT + TACE vs IT19.0 vs 13.012.0 vs 7.3TACE enhances immune-targeted response
Lu et al[39]227 Vp2–Vp3 PVTTTACE + PEI + Lenvatinib vs TACE + Lenvatinib50.5 vs 25.817.1 vs 13.98.1 vs 6.5PEI boosts PVTT regression
Lu et al[40]105 Vp4 PVTT125I stent + TACE vs Sorafenib + TACE9.9 vs 6.36.6 vs 4.2125I stent prolongs survival and patency
Zou et al[41]165 HCC with PVTTTACE + Lenvatinib + PD-1 vs TACE + Sorafenib + PD-141.3 vs 30.621.7 vs 15.66.3 vs 3.2Lenvatinib triple better than Sorafenib triple
Lin et al[42]95 PVTT + APFsHAIC + Lenvatinib + PD-1 vs TACE + Lenvatinib + PD-152.9 vs 27.925.0 vs 19.321.7 vs 8.7HAIC favored in APF setting
Zhao et al[43]58 PVTT + APFsTACE + 125I vs TACE + Sorafenib12.8 vs 8.0125I improves APF control and OS
Yang et al[44]116 PVTTTACE + Lenvatinib vs TACE + Sorafenib66.8 vs 33.318.97 vs 10.7710.6 vs 5.4TACE-L significantly outperforms TACE-S in ORR, OS, and PFS


Write to the Help Desk