©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 110107
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i10.110107
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i10.110107
Table 2 Summary of published studies on hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance (functional cure) in chronic hepatitis B
| Ref. | Year | Study type | n | Cohort and treatment | HBsAg seroclearance rate |
| Lau et al[36] | 2005 | RCT | 814 | HBeAg+ CHB on PEG-IFN α | 2.95% at 6 months post-treatment |
| Marcellin et al[39] | 2013 | RCT | 537 | HBeAg- CHB on PEG-IFN α | 3% (6 months), 9% (3 years), 12% (5 years) |
| Bourlière et al[53] | 2017 | RCT | 185 | HBeAg- CHB: NA vs NA + PEG-IFN | 3.2% vs 7.8% at 96 weeks |
| Ahn et al[55] | 2018 | RCT | 740 | TDF + PEG-IFN vs TDF mono | 9.1% vs 0% at 72 weeks |
| Zhou et al[32] | 2019 | Meta-analysis | 48972 | Untreated CHB | 1.17% per year |
| Yeo et al[33] | 2019 | Meta-analysis | 42588 | Untreated CHB | 1.02% per year |
| Yip et al[45] | 2019 | Retrospective | 20263 | CHB on TDF/ETV | 2.1% (mean FU: 4.8 years) |
| Yeo et al[34] | 2020 | Prospective cohort | 11262 | Untreated CHB | 1.31% per year |
| Yang et al[52] | 2020 | RCT | 144 | CHB on ETV vs ETV + PEG-IFN | 1.8% vs 4.1% |
| Fonseca et al[56] | 2020 | Meta-analysis | 8719 | CHB on IFN+NA vs IFN vs NA (48-130 weeks) | 4.8% to 6.5% vs 3.6% to 6.5% vs 0.27% to 0.58% |
| Song et al[43] | 2021 | Meta-analysis | 1029 | IHCs on PEG-IFN | 47% at 48 weeks |
| Hsu et al[47] | 2021 | Retrospective | 4769 | CHB on TDF/ETV | 0.22% per year |
| Chan et al[48] | 2024 | RCT | 1298 | CHB on TAF | ≤ 1.2% at 5 years |
- Citation: Marrapu S, Soni JR, Kamal K, Kumar R. Hepatitis B functional cure: Current and future perspective. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(10): 110107
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i10/110107.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i10.110107