Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2022; 14(7): 1438-1458
Published online Jul 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i7.1438
Table 5 Cox regression models for eDAE and DAE by AGT2 (rs4762)
Event
Center
AGT2(rs4762)
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI) adjusted for BCLC + ECOG-PS
P value
HR (95%CI) adjusted for BCLC + ECOG-PS + AHT + DM
P value
HR (95%CI) adjusted for AHT + DM
P value
HR (95%CI) adjusted for DM
P value
HR (95%CI) adjusted for AHT
P value
eDAEBCLC1 cohortAA vs AG1.14 (0.22-5.89)0.90.98 (0.19-5.12)0.90.97 (0.18-5.04)0.91.09 (0.21-5.64)0.91.15 (0.22-5.95)0.91.11 (0.21-5.72)0.9
AA vs GG0.84 (0.2-3.53)0.80.73 (0.17-3.15)0.70.71 (0.16-3.1)0.70.81 (0.19-3.4)0.80.8 (0.19-3.39)0.80.84 (0.2-3.54)0.8
AG vs GG0.73 (0.28-1.91)0.50.74 (0.28-1.94)0.50.74 (0.28-1.97)0.60.74 (0.28-1.94)0.60.7 (0.27-1.82)0.50.76 (0.29-1.98)0.6
BCLC2 cohortAA vs AG3.71 (0.62-22.39)0.23.52 (0.58-21.5)0.24.8 (0.74-31.28)0.14.81 (0.74-31.24)0.14.78 (0.76-29.88)0.094.46 (0.7-28.35)0.11
AA vs GG4.43 (1.01-19.39)0.0484.24 (0.95-19.06)0.066.14 (1.28-29.55)0.026.28 (1.32-29.95)0.026.25 (1.35-28.89)0.025.34 (1.15-24.86)0.03
AG vs GG1.19 (0.35-4.08)0.81.21 (0.35-4.15)0.81.28 (0.37-4.45)0.71.31 (0.38-4.47)0.71.31 (0.38-4.47)0.71.2 (0.35-4.08)0.8
Northern Italy cohortAA vs AG2.72 (0.57-13.1)0.23.21 (0.64-15.99)0.155.61 (1.01-31.12)0.0483.43 (0.69-16.96)0.132.69 (0.56-12.97)0.23.2 (0.66-15.6)0.15
AA vs GG4.54 (1.05-19.64)0.045.15 (1.17-22.63)0.038.51 (1.78-40.54)0.0075.51 (1.25-24.33)0.024.72 (1.09-20.48)0.044.93 (1.13-21.41)0.03
AG vs GG1.67 (0.69-4.02)0.31.6 (0.66-3.9)0.31.52 (0.6-3.82)0.41.61 (0.66-3.9)0.31.75 (0.73-4.24)0.21.54 (0.63-3.73)0.3
Naples cohortAG vs GG1.2 (0.48-3.01)0.71.2 (0.48-3.02)0.71.25 (0.5-3.15)0.61.26 (0.5-3.16)0.61.2 (0.48-3)0.71.29 (0.51-3.23)0.6
BCLC2 cohort + Naples cohort + Northern Italy cohortAA vs AG2.76 (0.92-8.27)0.072.95 (0.97-9.84)0.062.78 (0.9-8.56)0.072.61 (0.87-7.86)0.092.75 (0.92-8.25)0.072.61 (0.87-7.86)0.09
AA vs GG3.5 (1.27-9.67)0.023.8 (1.36-10.58)0.013.67 (1.31-10.3)0.013.39 (1.22-9.37)0.023.5 (1.27-9.66)0.023.38 (1.22-9.37)0.02
AG vs GG1.27 (0.73-9.67)0.41.29 (0.74-2.25)0.41.32 (0.75-2.32)0.31.3 (0.74-2.27)0.41.27 (0.73-2.22)0.41.3 (0.74-2.27)0.4
BCLC1 cohort + Naples cohort +Northern Italy cohortAA vs AG1.66 (0.65-4.9)0.41.63 (0.55-4.85)0.41.53 (0.51-4.57)0.51.54 (0.52-4.57)0.41.66 (0.56-4.9)0.41.54 (0.52-4.57)0.4
AA vs GG1.83 (0.67-5.03)0.21.73 (0.63-4.77)0.31.7 (0.62-4.69)0.31.8 (0.65-4.94)0.31.85 (0.67-5.08)0.21.79 (0.65-4.93)0.3
AG vs GG1.1 (0.65-1.86)0.71.06 (0.63-1.81)0.81.11 (0.65-1.9)0.71.17 (0.69-1.97)0.61.11 (0.66-1.88)0.71.16 (0.69-1.97)0.6
BCLC1 cohort + BCLC2 cohort + Naples cohortAA vs AG1.67 (0.55-5.09)0.41.6 (0.53-4.87)0.41.61 (0.53-4.92)0.41.66 (0.55-5.06)0.41.71 (0.56-5.19)0.41.63 (0.54-4.95)0.4
AA vs GG1.7 (0.62-4.67)0.31.67 (0.61-4.59)0.31.68 (0.61-4.63)0.31.7 (0.62-4.67)0.31.7 (0.62-4.67)0.31.68 (0.61-4.62)0.3
AG vs GG1.01 (0.57-1.81)0.91.04 (0.58-1.86)0.91.04 (0.58-1.86)0.91.02 (0.57-1.82)0.90.99 (0.56-1.78)0.91.03 (0.58-1.84)0.9
DAEBCLC1 cohortAA vs AG2.8 (0.78-10.01)0.12.45 (0.68-8.81)0.22.73 (0.74-9.99)0.133.09 (0.85-11.2)0.092.85 (0.79-10.22)0.112.86 (0.8-10.28)0.11
AA vs GG1.82 (0.64-5.16)0.31.61 (0.56-4.64)0.41.89 (0.64-5.57)0.22.12 (0.74-6.1)0.161.79 (0.63-5.08)0.32.03 (0.71-5.78)0.19
AG vs GG0.65 (0.27-1.56)0.30.66 (0.27-1.59)0.40.69 (0.28-1.72)0.40.69 (0.28-1.68)0.40.63 (0.26-1.52)0.30.71 (0.29-1.71)0.4
BCLC2 cohortAA vs AG3.83 (0.64-23.05)0.13.71 (0.61-22.68)0.23.91 (0.62-24.73)0.154.05 (0.65-25.33)0.144.49 (0.73-27.55)0.13.79 (0.61-23.44)0.15
AA vs GG3.22 (0.75-13.76)0.13.27 (0.74-14.38)0.13.74 (0.82-17.15)0.093.7 (0.82-16.76)0.094.04 (0.91-18)0.073.18 (0.72-14.13)0.13
AG vs GG0.84 (0.25-2.8)0.80.88 (0.26-2.96)0.80.96 (0.28-3.24)0.90.92 (0.27-3.06)0.90.9 (0.27-3.01)0.90.84 (0.25-2.8)0.8
Northern Italy cohortAA vs AG2.85 (0.59-13.73)0.23.28 (0.66-16.21)0.14.71 (0.89-24.91)0.073.4 (0.69-16.77)0.132.83 (0.59-13.64)0.23.13 (0.65-15.21)0.16
AA vs GG3.68 (0.86-15.63)0.084.15 (0.96-17.87)0.065.97 (1.32-27.01)0.024.41 (1.02-19.03)0.0463.97 (0.93-16.94)0.063.8 (0.89-16.16)0.07
AG vs GG1.29 (0.55-3.01)0.61.26 (0.54-2.96)0.61.27 (0.53-3.05)0.61.3 (0.55-3.05)0.61.4 (0.6-3.29)0.41.21 (0.52-2.84)0.7
Naples cohortAG vs GG1.12 (0.45-2.77)0.81.11 (0.45-2.76)0.81.12 (0.45-2.79)0.81.13 (0.46-2.82)0.81.12 (0.45-2.77)0.91.16 (0.47-2.88)0.8
BCCL2 cohort + Naples cohort + Northern Italy cohortAA vs AG2.79 (0.93-8.35)0.073.04 (1-9.21)0.0492.72 (0.88-8.34)0.082.54 (0.84-7.63)0.12.74 (0.92-8.21)0.072.56 (0.85-7.7)0.09
AA vs GG2.96 (1.08-8.13)0.033.27 (1.18-9.05)0.023.07 (1.1-8.56)0.032.81 (1.02-7.73)0.0452.94 (1.07-8.07)0.042.83 (1.03-7.78)0.04
AG vs GG1.06 (0.62-1.83)0.81.07 (0.62-1.86)0.81.13 (0.65-1.96)0.71.11 (0.64-1.92)0.71.07 (0.62-1.85)0.81.11 (0.64-1.91)0.7
BCLC1 cohort + Naples cohort + Northern Italy cohortAA vs AG2.82 (1.13-7.07)0.032.9 (1.15-7.32)0.022.7 (1.06-6.84)0.042.66 (1.06-6.69)0.042.81 (1.12-7.05)0.032.68 (1.07-6.74)0.04
AA vs GG2.86 (1.24-6.58)0.012.84 (1.23-6.54)0.012.85 (1.24-6.57)0.012.94 (1.28-6.77)0.012.91 (1.27-6.7)0.012.94 (1.28-6.77)0.01
AG vs GG1.01 (0.61-1.68)0.90.98 (0.59-1.63)0.91.06 (0.63-1.77)0.81.1 (0.67-1.83)0.71.04 (0.63-1.71)0.91.1 (0.66-1.82)0.7
BCLC1 cohort + BCLC2 cohort + Naples cohortAA vs AG2.94 (1.14-7.6)0.032.85 (1.1-7.39)0.033.12 (1.2-8.14)0.023.21 (1.23-8.34)0.023.05 (1.18-7.9)0.022.9 (1.12-7.5)0.03
AA vs GG2.49 (1.08-5.73)0.032.48 (1.08-5.72)0.032.73 (1.18-6.32)0.022.75 (1.19-6.34)0.022.54 (1.1-5.85)0.032.51 (1.09-5.77)0.03
AG vs GG0.85 (0.49-1.48)0.60.87 (0.5-1.52)0.60.87 (0.5-1.53)0.70.86 (0.49-1.5)0.60.83 (0.48-1.45)0.50.87 (0.5-1.51)0.6

  • Citation: Sapena V, Iavarone M, Boix L, Facchetti F, Guarino M, Sanduzzi Zamparelli M, Granito A, Samper E, Scartozzi M, Corominas J, Marisi G, Díaz A, Casadei-Gardini A, Gramantieri L, Lampertico P, Morisco F, Torres F, Bruix J, Reig M. Polymorphism AGT2 (rs4762) is involved in the development of dermatologic events: Proof-of-concept in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(7): 1438-1458
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i7/1438.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i7.1438