Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2021; 13(7): 804-814
Published online Jul 27, 2021. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i7.804
Table 2 Reported data concerning bleeding complications of liver resection in patients with antithrombotic therapy
Ref.
Year, type
Surgery type
Drug use and exposure
Bleeding events
TE, mortality
Naito et al[9]2020, PSMLiver resection (n = 425)Patients with continued ASA (n = 63); Patients not on continued APT (control, n = 362); Post-PSM: 63 vs 63 matched casesBC 4.8% in continued ASA vs 4.8% in control (P = 1.00); SBL was identical (P = 0.54)TE 1.6% in continued ASA vs 4.8% in control (P = 0.62); Mortality 1.6% vs 1.6% (P = 1.00)
Fujikawa et al[10]2017, RCSLiver resection (n = 258) including 77 laparoscopic liver resectionPatients with ATT (n = 100); Patients without ATT (control; n = 158)BC 3.0% in ATT vs 3.8% in control (P > 0.05); No BC in laparoscopic surgery; SBL was identicalTE 1.0% vs 1.3% (P > 0.05); No TE in laparoscopic surgery; Mortality 1.0% vs 0% (P = 0.350)
Ishida et al[11]2017, CCSHBP surgery (n = 886) including 520 liver resectionPatients with ACT (n = 39); Patients with APT (n = 77); Patients without ATT (control, n = 770)BC 0.0% in ACT vs 1.3% in APT vs 3.4% in control (P = 0.32); SBL was identical (P = 0.99)TE 0% vs 1.3% vs 0.8% (P = 0.75); Mortality 0% vs 0% vs 1.2% (P = 0.50)
Gelli et al[12]2018, PSMLiver resection (n = 1803)Patients with continued ASA (n = 118); Patients not on continued APT (control, n = 1685); Post-PSM: 108 vs 108 matched casesOverall BC 10.2% in continued ASA vs 12.0% in control (P > 0.05); Major BC 6.5% vs 5.6% (P > 0.05)Mortality 5.6% vs 4.6% (P > 0.05)
Monden et al[13]2017, CCSLiver resection (n = 378)Patients with continued ASA (n = 31); Patients not on continued APT (control, n = 347)Major BC 0% in continued ASA vs 0.3% in control (P > 0.05); SBL 450 mL vs 360 mL (P = 0.735)TE 3.2% vs 0% (P > 0.05); Mortality 3.2% vs 0.9% (P = 0.291)
Fujikawa et al[14]2019, CCSHBP surgery (n = 105) including 37 liver resectionPatients with DOAC (n = 35); Patients with WF (control, n = 80)BC 2.9% in DOAC vs 0% in WF (P = 0.304); SBL was identical (P = 0.782)No TE event in both groups; No mortality in both groups