Surgical treatment outcomes of primary hepatic sarcomas: A single-center experience

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population

Case	Sex	Age	Pathology	Size (cm)	Operation, R Status	Adjuvant therapy	Recurrence (mo)	Follow-up (mo)	Outcomes
1	M	57	HAS	13.5	Lt. lobectomy, R0		1.7	2.2	Dead
2	F	2	HAS	21	Living donor LT, R0	CTx1	1.8	31.2	Dead
3	M	52	HAS	7.3	Rt. Trisectionectomy, R0		1.2	4.2	Dead
4	F	48	UDS	13	Rt. lobectomy, R0	CTx2	1.6	68.2	Dead
5	M	60	HAS	2.4	Living donor LT, R0	RT	11.0	13.4	Dead
6	F	53	UDS	25	Rt. Trisectionectomy, R2		0	1.3	Dead
7	M	62	HAS	2	Central hepatectomy, R0	RFA	59.9	135.1	Alive
8	F	60	UDS	11.5	Rt. lobectomy, R0	CTx, RT, Exc3	14.6	29.9	Alive
9	M	60	UDS	24	Rt. lobectomy and Rt. Npx, R0	CTx4	1.2	9.9	Dead

¹ICE (ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide) 6 cycles.

²VIP (etoposide/ifosfamide/cisplatin) 5 cylcles, AI (doxorubicin/ifosfamide) 5 cycles, docetaxel/gemcitabine 2 cycles.

³VIP (etoposide/ifosfamide/cisplatin) 6 cycles, RT on vertebral metastasis, abdominal wall metastatic tumor excision.

⁴AI (doxorubicin/ifosfamide) 4 cycles, docetaxel/gemcitabine 1 cycle. HAS: Hepatic angiosarcoma; UDS: Undifferentiated sarcoma; Npx: Nephrectomy; CTx: Chemotherapy; RT: Radiation therapy; RFA: Radiofrequency ablation; Exc: Excision.