Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2021; 13(11): 1584-1610
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i11.1584
Table 1 Non-invasive tests of hepatic fibrosis and potential confounding factors
Biomarker panel
Parameters
Validation
Prognostic ability
Confounding factors/limitations
APRIAST, plateletGoodFairLarge number of individuals fall in the indeterminate range
Fibrosis-4 indexAge, AST, ALT, plateletVery goodVery goodPoor performance in patients aged ≤ 35 yr
Low specificity in patients aged ≥ 65 yr
Less sensitive in South Asian Population
NAFLD fibrosis scoreAge, BMI, IFG or diabetes, AST, ALT, platelet, albuminVery goodGoodDifferent cutoff values needed for younger or older participants
Albumin may decrease in chronic illnesses, malnutrition, nephrotic syndrome and protein-losing enteropathy
Less sensitive in South Asian Population
Enhanced liver fibrosis panelPIIINP, HA, TIMP1GoodVery goodPIIINP is increased in other fibrotic diseases or bone fracture
TIMP1 is increased in cancer and inflammation
Not as widely available as non-patented scores and more expensive
FibroMeter NAFLDAge, weight, prothrombin index, ALT, AST, ferritin, fasting glucoseFairNAProthrombin index affected by anti-coagulants
Ferritin is an acute phase protein
Glucose is affected by anti-diabetic treatment
More validation needed
NIS4miR-34a-5p, α2-M, YKL-40, and glycated hemoglobinFairNANot as widely available as non-patented scores and more expensive
More validation is needed