Carvedilol vs endoscopic variceal ligation for primary and secondary prevention of variceal bleeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 5

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Hepatology

ISSN

1948-5182

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Hepatol. May 27, 2019; 11(5): 464-476
Published online May 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i5.464

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 A risk of bias summary showing the researchers’ opinions on each risk of bias item for each of the seven included studies.

Citation: Dwinata M, Putera DD, Adda’i MF, Hidayat PN, Hasan I. Carvedilol vs endoscopic variceal ligation for primary and secondary prevention of variceal bleeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(5): 464-476
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v11/i5/464.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v11.i5.464

Dwinata M, Putera DD, Adda’i MF, Hidayat PN, Hasan I. Carvedilol vs endoscopic variceal ligation for primary and secondary prevention of variceal bleeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(5): 464-476 [PMID: 31183006 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i5.464]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.