Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2018; 10(10): 695-701
Published online Oct 27, 2018. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i10.695
Table 1 Studies evaluating the anthropometric indicators as predictors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Ref.CountryPopulation (n)Age (yr)Anthropometric indicatorNAFLD diagnosis
Yoo et al[14]South KoreaNAFLD (77)20-88WC and WHtRTomography
Non-NAFLD (379)
Zheng et al[9]ChinaNAFLD (250)36.6 ± 11.1WHR, BMI, WC and WHtRLiver biopsy
Non-NAFLD (240)37.3 ± 10.2
Ju et al[10]South KoreaNAFLD (2553)42.5 ± 5.1BMI and WCUltrasonography
Non-NAFLD (6606)41.6 ± 4.9
Cuthbertson et al[8]England and GermanyNAFLD (168)50.3 ± 11.9LAPProton magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Non-NAFLD (168)48.6 ± 10.9
Monteiro et al[16]BrazilObese with NAFLD (45)11-17WCUltrasonography
Obese without NAFLD (100)
Zhang et al[17]ChinaNAFLD (362)7-18WHtR, BMI and WCUltrasonography
Non-NAFLD (6867)
Motamed et al[11]IranNAFLD (2048)48.6 ± 12.7WHtR, WHR, ABSI, BRIUltrasonography
Non-NAFLD (2824)39.0 ± 15.4
Özhan et al[18]TurkeyObese without NAFLD (130)11.6 ± 2.7WHtRUltrasonography
Obese with NAFLD (202)12.1 ± 2.6
Lin et al[19]TaiwanNAFLD (167)18.8 ± 1.9WHtR, WHRUltrasonography
Non-NAFLD (1043)15.1 ± 2.8
Lee et al[15]United StatesBlack (94) and White (58)14.7 ± 1.8WCProton magnetic resonance spectroscopy
overweight and obese adolescents14.5 ± 1.5
Dai et al[20]ChinaNAFLD (12150)18-94LAPUltrasonography
Non-NAFLD (28309)