©2009 Baishideng.
World J Hepatol. Oct 31, 2009; 1(1): 79-89
Published online Oct 31, 2009. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v1.i1.79
Published online Oct 31, 2009. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v1.i1.79
Table 1 Outcomes of patients undergoing major vessel resection/reconstruction
| Patient No. | Resected vessel (s) | Reconstruction | No. of Hx | Age | Gender | Tumor distribution | No. of tumors | Maximum size (mm) | Resection margin | Outcome month | Status |
| 1 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 72 | F | Bilobar | 2 | 42 | Negative | 45 | DDT |
| 2 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 70 | M | Unilobar | 2 | 15 | Negative | 67 | DDT |
| 3 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 61 | M | Unilobar | 1 | 33 | Positive | 12 | DDT |
| 4 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 64 | M | Bilobar | 5 | 58 | Positive | 39 | DDT |
| 5 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 70 | F | Bilobar | 3 | 75 | Negative | 33 | DDT |
| 6 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 54 | M | Bilobar | 27 | 75 | Positive | 4 | DDT |
| 7 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 61 | F | Bilobar | 6 | 110 | Positive | 37 | DDT |
| 8 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 72 | M | Bilobar | 5 | 20 | Negative | 11 | DDT |
| 9 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 69 | F | Unilobar | 1 | 35 | Negative | 34 | NED |
| 10 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 71 | M | Unilobar | 1 | 55 | Positive | 31 | NED |
| 11 | IVC | Primary closure | 1 | 68 | F | Unilobar | 2 | 74 | Positive | 4 | NED |
| 12 | IVC | Graft replacement | 1 | 70 | F | Bilobar | 6 | 63 | Negative | 16 | AWD |
| 13 | IVC | Primary closure | 2 | 73 | M | Unilobar | 1 | 40 | Negative | 125 | DOD |
| 14 | IVC | Primary closure | 2 | 47 | F | Bilobar | 4 | 38 | Negative | 75 | DOD |
| 15 | IVC | Primary closure | 2 | 65 | M | Unilobar | 1 | 42 | Positive | 38 | DDT |
| 16 | IVC | Primary closure | 2 | 61 | M | Unilobar | 1 | 29 | Negative | 22 | DDT |
| 17 | IVC | Patch closure | 2 | 53 | F | Bilobar | 3 | 40 | Negative | 59 | DDT |
| 18 | IVC | Graft replacement | 2 | 56 | M | Unilobar | 1 | 50 | Negative | 3 | NED |
| 19 | IVC | Primary closure | 3 | 57 | F | Unilobar | 1 | 36 | Negative | 25 | DDT |
| 20 | IVC-LHV | Primary closure | 3 | 54 | F | Unilobar | 1 | 23 | Positive | 45 | DDT |
| 21 | MHV | Graft replacement | 1 | 62 | M | Bilobar | 4 | 45 | Positive | 55 | DDT |
| 22 | MHV | Graft replacement | 1 | 60 | M | Bilobar | 2 | 56 | Negative | 52 | AWD |
| 23 | MHV | Graft replacement | 2 | 80 | M | Unilobar | 1 | 45 | Negative | 13 | DDT |
| 24 | RHV | End-to-end | 1 | 60 | F | Unilobar | 1 | 19 | Negative | 24 | DDT |
| 25 | RHV | Patch closure | 1 | 55 | M | Bilobar | 5 | 17 | Positive | 71 | DDT |
- Citation: Tanaka K, Matsuyama R, Takeda K, Matsuo K, Nagano Y, Endo I. Aggressive liver resection including major-vessel resection for colorectal liver metastases. World J Hepatol 2009; 1(1): 79-89
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v1/i1/79.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v1.i1.79