Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Stem Cells. Jan 26, 2014; 6(1): 1-10
Published online Jan 26, 2014. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i1.1
Table 1 Bioreactor systems for hematopoietic differentiation from pluripotent stem cells
Bioreactor typePSC linePerformanceRef.
Spinner flaskhESC lines: H9 and H115-fold expansion in cell number compared to 4-fold in static culture; 5%-6% CD34+ CD31+ cellsCameron et al[27]
RWVMouse ESC line: R1Hematopoietic differentiation in RWV generated more Sca-1+ cells; while spinner flasks generated more c-kit+ progenitorsFridley et al[25]
Microcarrier-based spinner flaskhESC lines: WA01 (H1), WA09 (H9), HuES3, MA09; hiPSC line: IMR90-1DE-53 microcarriers were used. EBs were formed 10 times more efficiently compared to 2-D culture; CFUs were similar to static cultureLu et al[67]
Perfusion bioreactorMouse ESC line: D3 Mouse ESC line: CCEPerfusion promoted hematopoietic differentiation; Perfusion in 3-D fibrous scaffolds supported 2-3 fold higher cell density compared to static culture; comparable CFU percentageWolfe et al[77]; Li et al[24]