Editorial
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Stem Cells. Apr 26, 2011; 3(4): 25-33
Published online Apr 26, 2011. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v3.i4.25
Table 2 The different steps for a clinical trialand cancer cells
Steps of clinical trialElements of discussion
DesignAutologous
Immunocompatibility
Lag of time between fat sampling and delivery
Amount of cells
Allogenic
Histocompability issue
If bank, ready to use treatment
Inclusion criteria
Too broad: leads to wrong conclusions associated with great variability and independent parameters,
Too restricted: enrolment difficulties associated with non relevant and inadequate parameters
Exclusion criteria
Too broad: enrolment difficulties associated with non relevant and inadequate parameters
Too restricted: risks of adverse side effects associated with interactions between transplanted cells and undesirable context
Number of patients: statistically defined
Objective and well-established criteria of safety and efficacy
Uni or multicenter analysis
Standardization of procedures between centers
Efficiency of enrolment
SamplingLiposuction:
Local anesthesia
Fat depot
Technique (no ultra-sound)
Anti-coagulant
CultureOpened or closed system
Bovine or human-derived products
Number of passages
Quality and Safety control
Release criteria
Injectioniv
Poorly invasive but large distribution and mostly trapped in lung
im or intra tissue
More invasive
More restricted localization
Pressure challenge for adipose-derived stromal cells
Monitoring of the tolerance and the safetyCriteria: pain, wound healing, inflammation, immunology, tumor
Kinetics for analysis
Short and long term safety
Monitoring of the resultsObjective criteria, standardisation of procedures
Analysis of the resultsAdequate statisitic
Stick to primary and secondary aims