Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. Sep 26, 2026; 18(9): 124197
Published online Sep 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.124197
Published online Sep 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.124197
Figure 3 Morphological comparison of passaged cells.
A: Group A: Passage 3 (P3) cells exhibited a mixture of fusiform and polygonal cells (a1); P6 cells showed an increase in cytoplasmic granules (a2); P9, senescent cells with a flattened, widened “cicada-wing-like” appearance (a3); B: Group B: P3 cells are uniformly spindle-shaped and arranged in a swirl pattern (b1); P6, vigorous proliferation (b2); P9, dense and uniform morphology with good adhesion (b3). Scale bar: 500 μm.
- Citation: Lai SY, Jiang Y, Yuan R, Wang Z, Wang YC, Zhao ZT, Cai CY, Ruan MY, Zeng YX, Ren B, Wang XF. Density gradient centrifugation vs adherence for rat intestinal mesenchymal stem cell isolation. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(9): 124197
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v18/i9/124197.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.124197