BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. Aug 26, 2026; 18(8): 121648
Published online Aug 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.121648
Table 1 Summary of key clinical studies evaluating mesenchymal stem cell therapy in Crohn’s disease
Ref.
Country
n (control vs MSC)
Autologous/allogeneic
Cell type/product
Follow-up
Main outcomes
Molendijk et al[48], 2015Netherlands6 vs 15AllogeneicBM-MSC24 weeksFistula healing 40% vs 0%; good safety
Panés et al[42], 2016Europe/Israel107 vs 105AllogeneicAD-MSC (Cx601, darvadstrocel)24 weeksCombined remission 50% vs 34%; similar safety
Panés et al[6], 2018Europe/Israel103 vs 102AllogeneicAD-MSC (Cx601)52 weeksSustained remission 56% vs 36%
Zhou et al[49], 2020China11 vs 11AutologousAD-MSC52 weeksHealing 63.6%; CDAI & PDAI improved; safe
Garcia-Olmo et al[50], 2022Europe/Israel15 vs 25AllogeneicAD-MSC (Cx601)104 weeksSustained closure approximately 65%; no long-term safety issues
Lightner et al[51], 2023United States2-4 vs 4-15AllogeneicBM-MSC/Remestemcel-L6 weeks to 3 monthsFistula healing; CDAI & CRP improvement; acceptable safety
Lindsay et al[52], 2017United Kingdom9 vs 13AutologousHSC48 weeksCDAI, SES-CD, IBDQ, MARIA, PRO2 improved; reversible AEs


Write to the Help Desk