Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. May 26, 2026; 18(5): 117689
Published online May 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.117689
Published online May 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.117689
Table 2 Comparative features of exosomes from mesenchymal stromal cell sources in osteoarthritis models
| Source | Main advantages in osteoarthritis context | Principal limitations or concerns |
| Bone marrow[59-61] | Strong chondrogenic lineage; rich ECM-related proteome; extensive mechanistic data and historical use in cartilage repair | Donor age dependence; invasive harvest; intermediate performance in comparative exosome meta-analysis; variable outcomes in MSC trials |
| Adipose tissue[63,64] | Abundant, minimally invasive harvest; high cell yield; strong immunomodulatory profile; good pain relief in MSC trials | Some preparations favour fibrocartilage over hyaline repair; structural regeneration less consistent; potential influence of donor metabolic status |
| Umbilical cord[65] | Neonatal cells with high proliferative capacity; off-the-shelf allogeneic banking; robust anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective actions; early clinical data in KOA | Fewer long-term joint safety data; regulatory complexity of allogeneic products |
| Synovium/synovial fluid[34,60] | Joint-specific tissue origin; excellent targeting and regenerative potency, especially with miR-140-5p enrichment; top rankings in rodent network analyses | Arthroscopic retrieval for autologous use; scalability challenges; limited clinical-grade products |
- Citation: Raja A, Jeyaraman N, Sukumaran AM, Sridhar AS, Ramasubramanian S, Nallakumarasamy A, Muthu S, Jeyaraman M. Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes in knee osteoarthritis: Bridging mechanistic understanding to clinical applications. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(5): 117689
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v18/i5/117689.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.117689