Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. May 26, 2026; 18(5): 117591
Published online May 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.117591
Published online May 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.117591
Table 3 Critical quality attributes and assays for advanced therapy medicinal product manufacturing
| Attribute | Example assays/methods | Guideline references |
| Identity | Flow cytometry (cell surface markers), PCR for unique genes | EMA/ICH guidance, pharmacopoeias |
| Purity | Sterility testing, mycoplasma PCR, endotoxin (LAL assay) | Ph.Eur./USP |
| Viability | Dye exclusion (trypan blue, 7-AAD), metabolic activity assays | CBER/EMA guidance |
| Potency | Functional bioassays (e.g., MSC-mediated T-cell suppression) | Case-specific; often ICH Q6B |
| Genetic stability | Karyotype, array CGH, NGS for mutations | CBER draft guidance, ISSCR recommendations |
| Tumorigenicity | Soft agar colony formation, injection into immunodeficient mice[23] | WHO TRS 878, FDA draft guidance |
| Viral safety | Filtration of spent media, adventitious virus testing panels | ICH Q5A(R2)[27] |
| Exosome-specific | Particle size analysis (NTA), exosome marker proteins (CD63, CD81)[16] | MISEV2018 standard |
- Citation: Ebrahim NAA, Farghaly TA, Masaret GS, Alsaedi AMR, Soliman SMA. From laboratory to clinic: Bridging regulatory and manufacturing gaps in stem cell-based therapies. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(5): 117591
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v18/i5/117591.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.117591