Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. May 26, 2026; 18(5): 115486
Published online May 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.115486
Published online May 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.115486
Table 3 Comparative analysis and critical appraisal of therapeutic strategies for intrauterine adhesions
| Strategy | Theoretical rationale/mechanism of action | Current best efficacy signal (source) | Key methodological limitations (source) | Unresolved translational challenges |
| hUC-MSCs alone (intrauterine perfusion) | Minimally invasive; direct delivery of viable cells and paracrine factors | Improved menstrual volume and endometrial morphology in a small, mixed cohort[64] | Very small, heterogeneous sample; no control group; IUA-specific pregnancy data not reported[64] | Low cell retention; optimal dose and timing undefined; durability of effect unproven |
| hUC-MSCs + collagen scaffold | Enhanced cell retention and survival; provides 3D structural support and a physical barrier against adhesion reformation | Live birth rate of 30.8% in patients with severe IUA[65] | Single-arm, open-label design; small sample size; follow-up ended at delivery (no long-term offspring data)[65] | Risk of fibrotic recurrence; necessity for long-term tumorigenicity monitoring; scaffold standardization (e.g., degradation kinetics, porosity) |
| hUC-MSCs + HA-GEL | Biocompatible anti-adhesion barrier; serves as a hydrogel carrier for sustained factor release; fosters an anti-inflammatory microenvironment | Significant endometrial regeneration and reduced fibrosis in a primate IUA model[79,80] | Efficacy in humans pending validation in large-scale trials with standardized reproductive endpoints | Defining the therapeutic window of gel residence and bioactivity; clinical cost-effectiveness analysis |
| hUC-MSC-exosomes + scaffold | Cell-free approach mitigates risks of live-cell transplantation; scaffold enables controlled release; potent immunomodulatory cargo | Restoration of fertility and induction of M2 macrophage polarization in a rat IUA model[81] | Awaiting clinical translation; challenges in exosome standardization and scalable GMP manufacturing | Potential immunogenicity of allogeneic exosomes; long-term biodistribution and safety profile; development of validated potency assays |
| hUC-MSC-exosomes + estrogen | Synergistic action: Estrogen priming optimizes endometrial receptivity, while exosomes deliver targeted regenerative signals | Superior anti-fibrotic and pro-angiogenic effects compared to monotherapy in a rat IUA model[82] | No clinical data available; long-term safety of combined therapy unknown | Mechanistic understanding of synergy; criteria for patient stratification; optimization of the combined dosing regimen |
- Citation: Wang HL, Zhang SD, Liu T, Liu LM, Pan XY. Innovations in the treatment of endometrial diseases: Role of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(5): 115486
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v18/i5/115486.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.115486