Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. Mar 26, 2026; 18(3): 116226
Published online Mar 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i3.116226
Published online Mar 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i3.116226
Table 3 Comparison of exosomes isolation methods
| Isolation method | Purity | Pros | Cons |
| Ultracentrifugation | Low | Widely used, simple protocol | Time-consuming, multi-step process, high contamination risk |
| Size exclusion chromatography | High | Fast, simple and low-cost | Subtyping involves significant sample sizes and another procedure |
| Immunoaffinity-based approaches | High | Does not require special equipment, enrich cell-specific exosomes by targeted surface markers | Relies on high-cost antibodies, time consuming |
| Polymer-based precipitation | Low-to-medium | Low-cost method, easy protocol | Contamination risk, high cost, time consuming |
| Microfluidic devices | Low | Does not require special equipment, cost-effective | Design complexity |
| Nanotechnology | High | Commercially obtainable nanowires | High cost, restricts sample size |
- Citation: Choudhery MS, Arif T, Mahmood R, Harris DT. Stem cell derived exosomes: Emerging cell-free therapeutics for neurodegenerative disorders. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(3): 116226
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v18/i3/116226.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v18.i3.116226