BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. Oct 26, 2026; 18(10): 125852
Published online Oct 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.125852
Table 6 Disease-by-product-class evidence map for retinal secretome- and extracellular vesicle-based applications
Disease/application
Direct acellular evidence
Supportive/indirect evidence
Highest maturity
Interpretation
Diabetic retinopathyNative MSC-derived sEVs[14,35,36]; engineered MSC-derived EVs[37]Viable-MSC evidence[30]Level 2Among the broadest preclinical application areas; no controlled human retinal evidence
Inherited retinal degeneration/retinitis pigmentosaMSC-derived EVs[15]; neural progenitor cell-derived EV preparations[24]Paracrine/miRNA evidence[16]; non-stem-cell photoreceptor EV engineering[38]Level 2Multiple animal studies, with substantial product-, model-, and dose-level heterogeneity
Optic-nerve injuryMSC-derived EV/exosome preparation[25]Viable-cell neuroprotective evidence[32]Level 2Preclinical evidence only
Dry AMD/oxidative RPE injuryMSC-derived exosome preparation[39]iPSC-RPE complement evidence[40] provides disease context rather than EV therapeutic evidenceLevel 1-2Preclinical evidence primarily from experimental oxidative/toxic injury models
Neovascular retinal diseaseEngineered MSC-derived exosome/EV approaches[26,33]Level 2Preclinical anti-angiogenic proof-of-concept, particularly for engineered products
Large/refractory macular holeMSC-derived exosome subgroup in an uncontrolled surgical case series[41]Concomitant PPV, ILM peeling, tamponade, and viable-MSC casesLevel 3Only direct human retinal signal in the reviewed corpus; independent EV efficacy cannot be established
Other retinal/optic-nerve applicationsSparse or heterogeneous direct evidenceViable-cell, non-stem-cell EV, or disease-context studiesLevel 1-2 or insufficientLeast mature areas; disease-specific validation remains necessary


Write to the Help Desk